Comparison of an aerial-based system and an on the ground continuous measuring device to predict yield of winter wheat

The objective of the research was to compare an aerial image with optical data of an on the ground platform device measuring continuously while driving through the field. For this latter, a Cropscan, Inc. multi-spectral radiometer was used to automatically take a measurement every 1-1.5 m. Field images of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) of both devices were compared in their capability estimating yield variability in a wheat field. An experimental field with three seeding densities and five nitrogen application rates was investigated. Every treatment had four repetitions, resulting in 60 plots of 12 m x 16 m. At harvest, yield variables of the plots (grain and straw yield (t/ha), dry matter content in grain and straw (t/ha), nitrogen in grain and straw (kg[N]/ha) and protein content (%) in grain) were collected to relate to the images of both systems. The NDVI of both measurement systems was well related to applied nitrogen in the field: correlation coefficients were 0.78 and 0.85 for the aerial-based and the ground-based system, respectively. There was a high similarity (correlation coefficient of 0.94) between NDVI measurements of both systems. NDVI was also well related to yield variables at harvest. The NDVI of the ground system was better related to yield variables at harvest compared to NDVI of the aerial system. Best correlation coefficient found for both systems was with nitrogen in grain: 0.84 and 0.91 for the aerial-based and the ground-based system, respectively. NDVI images were more related to yield quality. Grain yield already reached its optimum in the field, while grain quality still increased with increasing nitrogen application rate. For the ground system, the average estimation errors, when using linear regression analysis, were smaller than 10% for all yield variables except for estimated straw yield and estimated nitrogen content in straw. For the aerial system, also estimated total nitrogen content exceeded the 10% error percentage. Besides the higher accuracy in the estimation of yields variables, the ground system had the advantage of being cheaper and that the data were immediately available.

[1]  James W. Jones,et al.  Spatial validation of crop models for precision agriculture , 2001 .

[2]  Charles L. Mulchi,et al.  Growth, radiation use efficiency, and canopy reflectance of wheat and corn grown under elevated ozone and carbon dioxide atmospheres , 1996 .

[3]  C. Daughtry,et al.  Spectral estimates of absorbed radiation and phytomass production in corn and soybean canopies , 1992 .

[4]  A. Bakhsh,et al.  Use of site specific farming systems and computer simulation models for agricultural productivity and environmental quality , 1999 .

[5]  Arnon Karnieli,et al.  Decision support system for improving wheat grain quality in the Mediterranean area of Israel , 2004 .

[6]  Bernardo Friedrich Theodor Rudorff,et al.  Spectral response of wheat and its relationship to agronomic variables in the tropical region , 1990 .

[7]  R. Papendick,et al.  Cultivar and Climatic Effects on the Protein Content of Soft White Winter Wheat , 1993 .

[8]  James E. McMurtrey,et al.  Relationship of spectral data to grain yield variation , 1980 .

[9]  J. Morison,et al.  Effects of CO2 and temperature on growth and yield of crops of winter wheat over four seasons , 1997 .

[10]  W. G. Rees,et al.  The spatial and temporal effect of cloud cover on the acquisition of high quality landsat imagery in the European Arctic sector , 1994 .

[11]  V. N. Sridhar,et al.  Wheat production forecasting for a predominantly unirrigated region in Madhya Pradesh )India) , 1994 .

[12]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Remote sensing of biomass and yield of winter wheat under different nitrogen supplies , 2000 .

[13]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Opportunities and limitations for image-based remote sensing in precision crop management , 1997 .

[14]  M. S. Rasmussen.  Assessment of millet yields and production in northern Burkina Faso using integrated NDVI from the AVHRR. , 1992 .

[15]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  NON-DESTRUCTIVE AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATION OF VEGETATION STATUS , 2001 .

[16]  A. Huete,et al.  A review of vegetation indices , 1995 .

[17]  E. Bartholomé.  Radiometric measurements and crop yield forecasting Some observations over millet and sorghum experimental plots in Mali , 1988 .

[18]  R. G. Smith,et al.  Forecasting wheat yield in a Mediterranean-type environment from the NOAA satellite , 1995 .

[19]  P. R. van Gardingen,et al.  Scaling-up : from cell to landscape , 1997 .

[20]  B. Brisco,et al.  Precision Agriculture and the Role of Remote Sensing: A Review , 1998 .

[21]  C. Wiegand,et al.  Use of spectral vegetation indices to infer leaf area, evapotranspiration and yield. I. Rationale. , 1990 .

[22]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  A review of spectral properties of plants and their potential use for crop/weed discrimination in row-crops , 1998 .

[23]  J. Aase,et al.  Assessing winter wheat dry matter production via spectral reflectance measurements , 1981 .

[24]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  An investigation into the within-field spatial variability of grain quality. , 1999 .

[25]  J. Morison,et al.  Growth and yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) crops in response to CO2 and temperature , 1996, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[26]  L. López-Bellido,et al.  Effect of N rate, timing and splitting and N type on bread-making quality in hard red spring wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions , 2004 .

[27]  R. Nalepka,et al.  Wheat yield forecasts using Landsat data , 1977 .

[28]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Spectral estimates of the absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and light-use efficiency of a winter wheat crop subjected to nitrogen and water deficiencies† , 1990 .

[29]  A. J. Richardson,et al.  Vegetation indices in crop assessments , 1991 .

[30]  R. D. Jackson,et al.  Multidate spectral reflectance as predictors of yield in water stressed wheat and barley , 1981 .