Developing Extended Real and Virtual Robotics Enhancement Classes with Years 10-13

There is growing evidence of the potential of educational robotics to enhance science, technology, engineering and mathematics education provided that they are deployed carefully. This paper describes a developmental research project between a university and a secondary school in the UK to develop extended robotics enhancement classes, mainly using LEGO MINDSTORMS robotic kits, and GeoGebra, which was used to animate virtual robots. Two styles of class were deployed: student-led project creations and facilitator-led challenges. The pedagogical principles underpinning these classes and their design are discussed. Feedback generally indicated that the classes were successful and appreciated by the students but they experienced difficulties in incorporating the virtual robotic element. Lessons learnt from the project, including the development of employability skills, the potential impact on students with autism, and the effective use of peer students, are discussed. The possibility of combining the two styles of class together is proposed.

[1]  M. Blamires,et al.  The principles of Educational Robotic Applications (ERA): a framework for understanding and developing educational robots and their activities , 2010 .

[2]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Invited review: the synergy between virtual reality and robotics , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[4]  E. Glasersfeld.  Learning and adaptation in the theory of constructivism , 1993 .

[5]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Cristina P. Santos,et al.  Applications of simple robots to encourage social receptiveness of adolescents with autism , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  L. Mosley,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[8]  Martin Kandlhofer,et al.  Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils' technical- and social-skills and science related attitudes , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  J. McNiff.  Action Research Principles and Practice , 1988 .

[10]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Àgueda Gras-Velázquez,et al.  The Future of European STEM Workforce: What Secondary School Pupils of Europe Think About STEM Industry and Careers , 2016 .

[12]  Justin Dillon,et al.  Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education , 2015 .

[13]  Frank Stefan Becker,et al.  Why don't young people want to become engineers? Rational reasons for disappointing decisions , 2010 .

[14]  David Tall,et al.  Symbols and the Bifurcation Between Procedural and Conceptual Thinking , 2001 .

[15]  Lenni Haapasalo,et al.  Making Mathematics through Progressive Technology , 2010 .

[16]  David H. Cropley,et al.  Fostering Creativity in Engineering Undergraduates , 2000 .

[17]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Evaluating the Role of Collaboration Scripts as Group Guiding Tools in Activities of Educational Robotics: Conclusions from Three Case Studies , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[18]  Peter Samuels,et al.  Responding to the challenges of instrumental orchestration through physical and virtual robotics , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Markus Hohenwarter,et al.  The Strength of the Community , 2009 .

[20]  Barbara Jaworski.  Challenge and support in undergraduate mathematics for engineers in a GeoGebra medium , 2010 .

[21]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[22]  Peter Samuels.  Motivating Mathematics Learning through an Integrated Technology Enhanced Learning Environment , 2010 .

[23]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[24]  P. Samuels,et al.  Real and virtual robotics in mathematics education at the school–university transition , 2012 .

[25]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Engagement Theory: A Framework for Technology-Based Teaching and Learning. , 1998 .

[26]  Stefan Kaczmarczyk,et al.  Problem solving and creativity in engineering: conclusions of a three year project involving reusable learning objects and robots , 2010 .

[27]  K. Walsh.  Practice: The School Play Now , 1971 .

[28]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges , 2004 .

[29]  K. Topping.  Trends in Peer Learning , 2005 .

[30]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Learning by Design from Theory to Practice , 1998 .