Financial Performance Evaluation of Shipping Companies Using Entropy and Grey Relation Analysis

The international trade of Korea and Taiwan has been heavily dependent upon international sea transportation owing to geo-political aspects. Therefore, the two countries have promoted ocean-going shipping industry in order to support their export-oriented economies. Recent financial crisis in together with the economic slowdown has reduced seaborne trade cargoes, which resulted in remarkably deteriorated revenues of the container shipping sector. Major container shipping companies of both countries such as Evergreen, Yang Ming, Hyundai, and Hanjin under our study are no exception. This chapter aims to achieve two-fold aims. The first applies Entropy to find the relative weights of financial ratios of the four companies each year. In so doing, we can find the weights variance for the period of 1999–2009 based on the financial performance of the above companies. The second aim is to evaluate financial performance of the companies in the period by grey relation analysis. The findings in this chapter help shipping managers to mitigate impacts of the financial crisis on their companies.

[1]  Deng Ju-Long,et al.  Control problems of grey systems , 1982 .

[2]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[3]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation , 2005 .

[4]  Elton Fernandes,et al.  CAPITAL STRUCTURE IN THE WORLD AIRLINE INDUSTRY , 2004 .

[5]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Fuzzy Credibility Relation Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Problems , 1997, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Notis Pagiavlas,et al.  CORPORATE CAPITAL STRUCTURE IN TURBULENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY OF THE US AIRLINE INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[8]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory , 1994 .

[9]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Cheng-Wei Lin,et al.  A comparative study on financial positions of shipping companies in Taiwan and Korea using entropy and grey relation analysis , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[13]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Rong-Tsu Wang,et al.  A comparative analysis of the operational performance of Taiwan's major airports , 2004 .

[15]  Yu-Jie Wang,et al.  Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.  A decision support system for supplier selection based on a strategy-aligned fuzzy SMART approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  A Data Envelopment Analysis of Shipping Industry Bond Ratings , 2006 .

[18]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[19]  Trevor D. Heaver,et al.  The Evolving Roles of Shipping Lines in International Logistics , 2002 .

[20]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  A clustering method to identify representative financial ratios , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[21]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[22]  Rong-Her Chiu,et al.  The liberalization of shipping in Taiwan , 2007 .

[23]  Alexander M. Goulielmos Flagging out and the need for a new Greek maritime policy 1 Paper presented at the 1997 IAME Interna , 1998 .

[24]  Yu-Je Lee,et al.  A novel approach to construct grey principal component analysis evaluation model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Metin Celik,et al.  Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[27]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Yu-Jie Wang,et al.  Combining grey relation analysis with FMCGDM to evaluate financial performance of Taiwan container lines , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Carl A. Scheraga,et al.  Operational efficiency versus financial mobility in the global airline industry: a data envelopment and Tobit analysis , 2004 .

[30]  C. Feng,et al.  Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios , 2000 .

[31]  William F. Bowlin,et al.  Financial analysis of civil reserve air fleet participants using data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  C. E. Wang,et al.  The performance of Asian airlines in the recent financial turmoil based on VaR and modified Sharpe ratio , 2008 .

[33]  Xiaozhan Xu,et al.  A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[35]  Marc Levinson,et al.  The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger , 2006 .

[36]  P. T. Lee,et al.  Comparison analysis for subjective and objective weights of financial positions of container shipping companies , 2014 .

[37]  Francisco J. Montero Llácer Open registers: past, present and future , 2003 .

[38]  Y J Wang,et al.  FUZZY TOPSIS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING , 2003 .

[39]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Containerisation, Box Logistics and Global Supply Chains: The Integration of Ports and Liner Shipping Networks , 2008 .

[40]  Peter Bernard Marlow,et al.  Factors influencing the choice of flag: empirical evidence , 1998 .

[41]  Photis M. Panayides,et al.  Maritime Logistics and Global Supply Chains: Towards a Research Agenda , 2006 .

[42]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Evaluating financial performance of Taiwan container shipping companies by strength and weakness indices , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Math..

[44]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  Maritime logistics in the global supply chain , 2009 .

[45]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[46]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making , 2005, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[47]  Jing-nan Sun,et al.  Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. , 2006, Journal of environmental sciences.

[48]  Alan Jessop,et al.  Minimally biased weight determination in personnel selection , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  George Halkos,et al.  Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with the use of financial ratios: a data envelopment analysis approach , 2004 .

[50]  Kuang Lin,et al.  Developing direct shipping across the Taiwan Straits , 2006 .

[51]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Automatic clustering of business processes in business systems planning , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Ching-Wu Chu,et al.  PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY EVALUATION OF THE TAIWAN'S SHIPPING INDUSTRY: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2005 .