Micromolar concentrations of base quenchers impact the apparent efficiency of photoacid generation in chemically amplified resists

The chemical composition of the base quencher added to chemically amplified photoresist formulations was found to influence the apparent efficiency of processes that lead to photoacid generation upon exposure to ionizing radiation. Resists formulated with the base quencher 1-piperidineethanol (1PE) required lower exposure doses to render development than resists containing 3-piperidino-1,2-propanediol (3P12PD) as the base. A standard addition technique was employed to determine the efficiency of photoacid generation in resist formulations consisting of one of the two base quenchers, the photoacid generator triphenylsulfonium triflate, and a matrix polymer composed of primarily p-hydroxystyrene and tert-butylacrylate monomers (environmentally stable chemically amplified photoresist type). The resist containing 1PE exhibited an apparently greater efficiency for photoacid generation than the formulation containing 3P12PD. Analysis of development processes showed that resists containing these bases exhibited identical dissolution behavior to that of a system without base quencher, verifying that resist dissolution could not explain the difference in exposure dose required for development of the 1PE and 3P12PD resists. Furthermore, the action of photoacid to deprotect the polymer, as interpreted from infrared spectroscopy, and the concentration of photoacid required to render development were the same for both resists. These results suggest that the small concentration of base in the resist may participate in the complicated chemical processes that produce photoacid from the decomposition of PAG upon exposure to ionizing radiation.

[1]  Gerd Pohlers,et al.  Comparison of methods for acid quantification: impact of resist components on acid-generating efficiency , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Gregory Breyta,et al.  Effect of resist components on image spreading during postexposure bake of chemically amplified resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Lewis W. Flanagin,et al.  Understanding nonlinear dissolution rates in photoresists , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Lewis W. Flanagin,et al.  Molecular model of phenolic polymer dissolution in photolithography , 1999 .

[5]  Hans Loeschner,et al.  Measuring acid generation efficiency in chemically amplified resists with all three beams , 1999 .

[6]  P. S. Hauge,et al.  Characterization of positive photoresist , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[7]  Adam R. Pawloski,et al.  A Standard Addition Technique To Quantify Photoacid Generation in Chemically Amplified Photoresist , 2001 .

[8]  B. L. Henke,et al.  X-Ray Interactions: Photoabsorption, Scattering, Transmission, and Reflection at E = 50-30,000 eV, Z = 1-92 , 1993 .

[9]  Takahiro Kozawa,et al.  Radiation and photochemistry of onium salt acid generators in chemically amplified resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Robert J. Kavanagh,et al.  Simple method for measuring acid generation quantum efficiency at 193 nm , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Charles R. Szmanda,et al.  Evaluation of the standard addition method to determine rate constants for acid generation in chemically amplified photoresist at 157 nm , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  K. Petrillo,et al.  ENVIRONMENTALLY STABLE CHEMICAL AMPLIFICATION POSITIVE RESIST: PRINCIPLE, CHEMISTRY, CONTAMINATION RESISTANCE, AND LITHOGRAPHIC FEASIBILITY , 1994 .

[13]  Lewis W. Flanagin,et al.  The Mechanism of Phenolic Polymer Dissolution: A New Perspective , 1997 .

[14]  J. Cameron,et al.  Performance Tradeoffs in the Design of Photoacid Generators for ArF Lithography , 2001 .