Although previous miniseries (e.g., see Carnine, 1994; Skinner & Berninger, 1997) and numerous individual articles (e.g., Daly, Witt, Martens, & Dool, 1997; Powell-Smith, Shinn, Stoner, & Good, 2000) have appeared in School Psychology Review exploring empirical and practical issues regarding academic skills, a focused discussion of academic enablers (or nonacademic skills that contribute to academic success) has yet to occur within the field of school psychology. As such, we have assembled a panel of distinguished researchers to share their perspectives regarding conceptual, empirical, and practical issues related to the construct of academic enablers. In the following paragraphs, we describe how the construct of academic enablers has been defined to date as well as provide a context for how academic enablers relate to academic skills and academic achievement. In addition, we explain the rationale for developing this miniseries and the objectives the included articles collectively address. This introduction c oncludes with an overview of each of the articles included in this special issue. Definition of Academic Enablers and Related Constructs The idea of academic enablers evolved from the work of researchers (e.g., Gresham & Elliott, 1990; Malecki, 1998; Wentzel, 1993; Wigfield & Karpathian, 1991) who explored the relationship between students' nonacademic behaviors (e.g., social skills, motivation) and their academic achievement. Based on this earlier research, we hypothesized that a student's academic success--or competence--in the classroom required more than academic skill proficiency. Specifically, we defined academic competence as a multidimensional construct consisting of the skills, attitudes, and behaviors of students that contribute to success in the classroom. The results of our research (DiPema & Elliott, 1999,2000) exploring this construct have indicated that the skills, attitudes, and behaviors contributing to academic competence fall into one of two domains: academic skills or academic enablers. Academic skills are the basic and complex skills that are the primary focus of academic instruction in elementary and secondary schools. In contrast, academic enablers are attitudes and behaviors that allow a student to participate in, and ultimately benefit from, academic instruction in the classroom. Through a variety of means (e.g., review of research literature, discussions with educators, empirical research), we have identified specific domains of academic skill and academic enablers that contribute to academic competence. Specifically, the academic skill domains include language-based skills (reading and writing), mathematics, and critical thinking (DiPerna & Elliott, 2000). The academic enablers include interpersonal skills, motivation, study skills, and engagement (DiPerna & Elliott, 1999, 2000). Figure 1 displays the academic enablers and skills that contribute to the construct of academic competence. Rationale for the Miniseries The rationale for this miniseries is based on the recognition that the current knowledge base regarding academic enablers has--at a minimum--three significant limitations. The first such limitation is that the current definition of academic enablers may be too narrow. That is, to date, academic enablers have been defined as the nonacademic skills, attitudes, and behaviors of students that contribute to academic success in the classroom. From Carroll's Model of School Learning (1963) to Walberg's Theory of Educational Productivity (1981), there is substantial empirical evidence that a variety of environmental factors influence learning. As such, some might suggest (see Christenson and Anderson, 2002) that the construct of academic enablers should be expanded to encompass key student and environmental factors that promote the development of academic skills. …
[1]
S. Elliott,et al.
A Model of Academic Enablers and Elementary Reading/Language Arts Achievement
,
2002
.
[2]
T. Keith.
Commentary: Academic Enablers and School Learning
,
2002
.
[3]
S. Christenson,et al.
Commentary: The Centrality of the Learning Context for Students' Academic Enabler Skills
,
2002
.
[4]
M. Gettinger,et al.
Contributions of Study Skills to Academic Competence
,
2002
.
[5]
C. Greenwood,et al.
Academic Engagement: Current Perspectives on Research and Practice
,
2002
.
[6]
K. Wentzel,et al.
Peer Relationships and Collaborative Learning as Contexts for Academic Enablers
,
2002
.
[7]
Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.
Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success
,
2002
.
[8]
E. Shapiro.
School Psychology from an Instructional Perspective: Solving Big, Not Little Problems
,
2000
.
[9]
M. Shinn,et al.
Parent Tutoring in Reading Using Literature and Curriculum Materials: Impact on Student Reading Achievement
,
2000
.
[10]
S. Elliott,et al.
Development and Validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales
,
1999
.
[11]
B. Martens,et al.
A Model for Conducting a Functional Analysis of Academic Performance Problems.
,
1997
.
[12]
V. Berninger.
Introduction to Interventions for Students with Learning and Behavior Problems: Myths and Realities.
,
1997
.
[13]
C. Greenwood.
The Case for Performance-Based Instructional Models.
,
1996
.
[14]
E. Jones,et al.
Mathematics: Educational Tools for Diverse Learners.
,
1994
.
[15]
Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.
Does Being Good Make the Grade? Social Behavior and Academic Competence in Middle School.
,
1993
.
[16]
H. Walberg,et al.
A structural model of science achievement and attitude : an extension to high school
,
1992
.
[17]
Herbert J. Walberg,et al.
A Process Model of Mathematics Achievement and Attitude.
,
1992
.
[18]
H. Walberg,et al.
A Structural Model of High School Mathematics Outcomes
,
1992
.
[19]
Allan Wigfield,et al.
Risk Taking: Theoretical, Empirical, and Educational Considerations
,
1991
.
[20]
Herbert J. Walberg,et al.
A Structural Model of Science Achievement.
,
1991
.
[21]
V. Cool,et al.
Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement☆
,
1991
.
[22]
J. Carroll.
A Model of School Learning
,
1963,
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.