Exaptation—a Missing Term in the Science of Form

Adaptation has been defined and recognized by two different criteria: historical genesis (fea- tures built by natural selection for their present role) and current utility (features now enhancing fitness no matter how they arose). Biologists have often failed to recognize the potential confusion between these different definitions because we have tended to view natural selection as so dominant among evolutionary mechanisms that historical process and current product become one. Yet if many features of organisms are non-adapted, but available for useful cooptation in descendants, then an important concept has no name in our lexicon (and unnamed ideas generally remain unconsidered): features that now enhance fitness but were not built by natural selection for their current role. We propose that such features be called exaptations and that adaptation be restricted, as Darwin suggested, to features built by selection for their current role. We present several examples of exaptation, indicating where a failure to concep- tualize such an idea limited the range of hypotheses previously available. We explore several consequences of exaptation and propose a terminological solution to the problem of preadaptation.

[1]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[2]  L. Matthews.  Reproduction in the Spotted Hyaena, Crocuta crocuta (Erxleben) , 1939 .

[3]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  A dictionary of biology , 1951 .

[4]  Michel Foucault,et al.  Madness and Civilization , 1961 .

[5]  The molecular-biologic background to the evolution of bone. , 1962 .

[6]  A. S. Romer.  THE “ANCIENT HISTORY” OF BONE , 1963, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  E. Vrba.  Evolution, species and fossils: How does life evolve? , 1965 .

[8]  W. Bock,et al.  ADAPTATION AND THE FORM–FUNCTION COMPLEX , 1965 .

[9]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[10]  Michel Foucault,et al.  The Order of Things , 2010 .

[11]  The pattern of vertebrate evolution , 1968 .

[12]  J. Richards.  The structure and action of proteins , 1969 .

[13]  Richard Earl Dickerson,et al.  Stereo supplement to the structure and action of proteins , 1969 .

[14]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[15]  Adolf Seilacher,et al.  ARBEITSKONZEPT ZUR KONSTRUKTIONS‐MORPHOLOGIE , 1970 .

[16]  J. Hailman,et al.  Roberts Birds of South Africa , 1971 .

[17]  Introduction to dental anatomy , 1971 .

[18]  R. Britten,et al.  Repetitive and Non-Repetitive DNA Sequences and a Speculation on the Origins of Evolutionary Novelty , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[19]  A. Seilacher,et al.  Divaricate patterns in pelecypod shells , 1972 .

[20]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  The Spotted Hyena: A Study of Predation and Social Behavior , 1972 .

[21]  R. Cofield.  Mercer's Orthopaedic Surgery , 1973 .

[22]  J. H. Ostrom.  Archaeopteryx and the Origin of Flight , 1974, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[23]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Stochastic Simulation and Evolution of Morphology-Towards a Nomothetic Paleontology , 1974 .

[24]  Thomas H. Frazzetta,et al.  Complex adaptations in evolving populations , 1975 .

[25]  B. Lewin.  Units of transcription and translation: Sequence components of heterogeneous nuclear RNA and messenger RNA , 1975, Cell.

[26]  Stanley N Cohen.  Transposable genetic elements and plasmid evolution , 1976, Nature.

[27]  N. Kleckner.  Translocatable elements in procaryotes , 1977, Cell.

[28]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  Ostrom Jh,et al.  Bird flight: how did it begin? , 1979, American scientist.

[30]  W. Doolittle,et al.  Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution , 1980, Nature.

[31]  W. Bock.  The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation , 1980 .

[32]  F. Crick,et al.  Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite , 1980, Nature.

[33]  Kurt M. Fristrup,et al.  The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion , 1982, Paleobiology.