Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options Exploring Futures of Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes through Participatory Scenario Development in the Swabian Alb, Germany

Cultural landscapes are appreciated for the plethora of ecosystem services that they provide to society. They are, however, subject to rapid and fundamental transformations across Europe, mainly as a result of intensification or abandonment of land uses. Our objective is to assess the possible future drivers of cultural landscape changes and their likely impacts on ecosystem services provision as perceived by local actors. We present stakeholder-based scenarios for the Swabian Alb, a biosphere reserve in southern Germany, projected to the yr 2040. On their basis, we explore the possibilities and limitations of local civil engagement for landscape conservation and development in the face of increasing global influences. The steps of the process are (a) identifying the key driving forces of landscape change, (b) developing contrasting narratives about alternative landscape futures, (c) refining the narratives, (d) discussing scenario impacts, and (e) exploring local management strategies. Four contrasting scenarios created by the stakeholders are presented. Global-level drivers are state support/regulations vs. free- market economy, and energy-intensive lifestyles vs. low-energy economy. Local-level forces are high vs. low consumer demand for localized food, and high vs. low appreciation of local cultural landscapes. Outcomes show that cultural landscape development may come to a crossroads over the next 30 yrs, with either combined land abandonment and landscape industrialization scenarios or multifunctional, locally distinct landscape futures being possible. The scenario narratives envision that the most powerful way to develop and protect distinct landscapes is to foster local people's links to cultural landscapes, to build social capital around them, and to direct consumption patterns toward localized food production. We find that participatory scenario processes have strengths in terms of the credibility, transferability, and confirmability of the insights gained, but are often weak in ensuring dependability.

[1]  Claudia Bieling,et al.  Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape , 2013 .

[2]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Linking Ecosystem Services with Cultural Landscape Research , 2010 .

[3]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[4]  J. W. Termorshuizen,et al.  Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  K. Prager Local and Regional Partnerships in Natural Resource Management: The Challenge of Bridging Institutional Levels , 2010, Environmental management.

[6]  J. Alcamo Environmental futures : the practice of environmental scenario analysis , 2008 .

[7]  J. Primdahl,et al.  Globalisation and Agricultural Landscapes: Change Patterns and Policy trends in Developed Countries , 2010 .

[8]  D. Edmunds,et al.  Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests , 2000 .

[9]  M. Penker,et al.  Scenarios for the Austrian food chain in 2020 and its landscape impacts , 2004 .

[10]  Robin M. Leichenko,et al.  Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization , 2000 .

[11]  Georges Brigham The year 2000 , 1997, CACM.

[12]  P. Verburg,et al.  Identifying assets and constraints for rural development with qualitative scenarios: A case study of Castro Laboreiro, Portugal , 2011 .

[13]  V. Reyes‐García,et al.  Traditional Ecological Knowledge Trends in the Transition to a Market Economy: Empirical Study in the Doñana Natural Areas , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[14]  Minna Kaljonen,et al.  Seeking policy-relevant knowledge: a comparative study of the contextualisation of participatory scenarios for the Narew River and Lake Peipsi , 2012 .

[15]  P. Selman,et al.  Landscape as a Focus for Integrating Human and Environmental Processes , 2006 .

[16]  Denis White,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FUTURES FOR THE WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON , 2004 .

[17]  R. Leichenko,et al.  Winners and Losers in the Context of Global Change , 2003 .

[18]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Assessing Future Ecosystem Services: a Case Study of the Northern Highlands Lake District, Wisconsin , 2003 .

[19]  T. Plieninger Monitoring directions and rates of change in trees outside forests through multitemporal analysis of map sequences , 2012 .

[20]  Teresa Pinto-Correia,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Centrally Defined Policies and Local Decisions – Towards more Sensitive and Creative Rural Landscape Management , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  O. Eriksson,et al.  Investigating biodiversity trajectories using scenarios--lessons from two contrasting agricultural landscapes. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  P. Verburg,et al.  Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  Karlheinz Knickel,et al.  Empowerment of Regional Partnerships , 2006 .

[24]  C. Potter,et al.  Envisioning Upland Futures: Stakeholder Responses to Scenarios for Europe's Mountain Landscapes. , 2008 .

[25]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Land ownership drives stand structure and carbon storage of deciduous temperate forests , 2013 .

[26]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Patterns and causes of land change: Empirical results and conceptual considerations derived from a case study in the Swabian Alb, Germany , 2013 .

[27]  G. Tress,et al.  Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning—a study from Denmark , 2003 .

[28]  K. Chan,et al.  Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .

[29]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Participatory Scenario Planning for Protected Areas Management under the Ecosystem Services Framework: the Doñana Social-Ecological System in Southwestern Spain , 2011 .

[30]  C. Palmer,et al.  The Complexities of Decentralization in a Globalizing World , 2009 .

[31]  O. Bens,et al.  Perspectives of Bioenergy for Agriculture and Rural Areas , 2006 .

[32]  J. Hauck Resilience and the Cultural Landscape-Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments , 2014 .

[33]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling , 2007 .

[34]  T. Plieninger,et al.  Resilience-based perspectives to guiding high-nature-value farmland through socioeconomic change , 2013 .

[35]  Henrique M. Pereira,et al.  Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: a Participatory Study in a Mountain Community in Portugal , 2005 .

[36]  Rachael Cole-Hawthorne Sustainable landscape planning the reconnection agenda , 2014 .

[37]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Scenario Development and Analysis for Forward-looking Ecosystem Assessments , 2010 .

[38]  K. Seto,et al.  Urban land teleconnections and sustainability , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Christina von Haaren,et al.  Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve , 2012 .

[40]  Philipp Mayring Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung : eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken , 1999 .

[41]  Peter Cronkleton,et al.  Future Scenarios as a Tool for Collaboration in Forest Communities , 2008 .

[42]  Wolfgang Loibl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Landscape Scenarios and Multifunctionality - Making Land Use Assessment Operational Generic Regional Development Strategies from Local Stakeholders' Scenarios - an Alpine Village Experience , 2010 .

[43]  P. Poschlod,et al.  The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands—lessons from the distant and recent past , 2002 .

[44]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change , 2013 .

[45]  Peter Cronkleton,et al.  Field guide to the future: four ways for communities to think ahead , 2006 .

[46]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance, Politics and the State , 2000 .

[47]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research , 2006 .

[48]  F. Herzog Streuobst: a traditional agroforestry system as a model for agroforestry development in temperate Europe , 1998, Agroforestry Systems.

[49]  A. Muhar,et al.  Benefits, efforts and risks of participants in landscape co-management: an analytical framework and results from two case studies in Austria. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  I. Ramos ‘Exploratory landscape scenarios’ in the formulation of ‘landscape quality objectives’ , 2010 .

[51]  T. Kuemmerle,et al.  Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes , 2012 .

[52]  A. Farina The Cultural Landscape as a Model for the Integration of Ecology and Economics , 2000 .

[53]  Michael Jones The European landscape convention and the question of public participation , 2007, Justice, Power and the Political Landscape.