The Optimization of an eHealth Solution (Thought Spot) with Transition-Aged Youth in Postsecondary Settings: Participatory Design Research

Background Seventy percent of lifetime cases of mental illness emerge before the age of 24 years, but many youth are unable to access the support and services they require in a timely and appropriate way. With most youth using the internet, electronic health (eHealth) interventions are promising tools for reaching this population. Through participatory design research (PDR) engagement methods, Thought Spot, a Web- and mobile-based platform, was redeveloped to facilitate access to mental health services by transition-aged youth (aged 16-29 years) in postsecondary settings. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the process of engaging with postsecondary students through the PDR approaches, with the ultimate goal of optimizing the Thought Spot platform. Methods Consistent with the PDR approaches, five student-led workshops, attended by 41 individuals, were facilitated to obtain feedback regarding the platform’s usability and functionality and its potential value in a postsecondary setting. Various creative engagement activities were delivered to gather experiences and opinions, including semistructured focus groups, questionnaires, personas, journey mapping, and a world café. Innovative technological features and refinements were also brainstormed during the workshops. Results By using PDR methods of engagement, participants knew that their ideas and recommendations would be applied. There was also an overall sense of respect and care integrated into each group, which facilitated an exchange of ideas and suggestions. Conclusions The process of engaging with students to redesign the Thought Spot platform through PDR has been effective. Findings from these workshops will significantly inform new technological features within the app to enable positive help-seeking behaviors among students. These behaviors will be further explored in the second phase that involves a randomized controlled trial.

[1]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[2]  C. Macdonald,et al.  UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY OPTION , 2012, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[3]  C. Witt,et al.  CAM Use and Suggestions for Medical Care of Senior Citizens: A Qualitative Study Using the World Café Method , 2013, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[4]  Reeva Lederman,et al.  Participatory design of an online therapy for youth mental health , 2013, OZCHI.

[5]  J. LeMaster,et al.  Participatory methods for research prioritization in primary care: an analysis of the World Café approach in Ireland and the USA , 2016, Family practice.

[6]  I. Hickie,et al.  The internet as a setting for mental health service utilisation by young people , 2010, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  Andrew Old,et al.  Improving healthcare through the use of co-design. , 2012, The New Zealand medical journal.

[8]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Enhancing Self-Efficacy for Help-Seeking Among Transition-Aged Youth in Postsecondary Settings With Mental Health and/or Substance Use Concerns, Using Crowd-Sourced Online and Mobile Technologies: The Thought Spot Protocol , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[9]  Mariesa Nicholas,et al.  Using participatory design methods to engage the uninterested , 2012, PDC '12.

[10]  S. Koch,et al.  Partnering with consumers to develop and evaluate a Vietnamese Dementia Talking-Book to support low health literacy: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research , 2016, BMJ Open.

[11]  J. Winterling,et al.  Development of a Self-Help Web-Based Intervention Targeting Young Cancer Patients With Sexual Problems and Fertility Distress in Collaboration With Patient Research Partners , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[12]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[13]  Ian M. Mitchell,et al.  Development of a Wheelchair Skills Home Program for Older Adults Using a Participatory Action Design Approach , 2014, BioMed research international.

[14]  Mihyun Kang,et al.  Design for Experiencing: Participatory Design Approach with Multidisciplinary Perspectives , 2015 .

[15]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  Raechel A. Damarell,et al.  Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions , 2015, JMIR human factors.

[17]  Michael Krausz,et al.  eMental Health Experiences and Expectations: A Survey of Youths' Web-Based Resource Preferences in Canada , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Jennifer Fleming,et al.  Building capacity for knowledge translation in occupational therapy: learning through participatory action research , 2016, BMC Medical Education.

[19]  J. Bartram,et al.  Improving community health through marketing exchanges: A participatory action research study on water, sanitation, and hygiene in three Melanesian countries. , 2016, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Design with and for disaffected teenagers , 2008, NordiCHI.

[21]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[22]  Rm Cross,et al.  Using storyboards in participatory research. , 2016, Nurse researcher.

[23]  Jonathan Delman.  Participatory action research and young adults with psychiatric disabilities. , 2012, Psychiatric rehabilitation journal.