Optimal Electrocardiographic Lead Systems: Practical Scenarios in Smart Clothing and Wearable Health Systems

Advances in wearable health systems, from a smart textile, signal processing, and wireless communications perspective, have resulted in the recent deployment of such systems in real clinical and healthcare settings. Nevertheless, the problem of identifying the most appropriate sites from which biological parameters can be recorded still remains unsolved. This paper aims to assess the effects of various practical constraints that may be encountered when choosing electrocardiographic recording sites for wearable health systems falling within the category of smart shirts for cardiac monitoring and analysis. We apply a lead selection algorithm to a set of 192 lead body surface potential maps (BSPM) and simulate a number of practical constraints by only allowing selection of recording sites from specific regions available in the 192 lead array. Of the various scenarios that were investigated, we achieved the best results when the selection process to identify the recording sites was constrained to an area around the precordial region. The top ten recording sites chosen in this region exhibited an rms voltage error of 25.8 muV when they were used to estimate total ECG information. The poorest performing scenario was that which constrained the selection to two vertical strips on the posterior surface. The top ten recording sites chosen in this scenario exhibited an rms voltage error of 41.1 muV. In general, it was observed that out of all the scenarios investigated, those which constrained available regions to the posterior and lateral surfaces performed less favorably than those where electrodes could also be chosen on the anterior surface. The overall results from our approach have validated the proposed algorithm and its ability to select optimal recording sites taking into consideration the practical constraints that may exist with smart shirts.

[1]  G. Wagner Marriott's Practical Electrocardiography , 1994 .

[2]  F Kornreich Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing acute myocardial ischemia. , 1998, Journal of electrocardiology.

[3]  I. Menown,et al.  Body-surface map models for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Journal of electrocardiology.

[4]  R. Macleod,et al.  Useful Lessons from Body Surface Mapping , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Lucy E. Dunne,et al.  Personalised health management systems: The integration of innovative sensing, textile, information and communication technologies , 2005 .

[7]  A. Lymberis,et al.  Wearable eHealth Systems For Personalised Health Management: State Of The Art and Future Challenges , 2004 .

[8]  R Hoekema,et al.  On selecting a body surface mapping procedure. , 1999, Journal of Electrocardiology.

[9]  Jennifer Healey Challenges of ambulatory physiological sensing. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  R. E. Mason,et al.  A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. , 1966, American heart journal.

[11]  Donald S Borrett,et al.  Evolutionary autonomous agents and the nature of apraxia , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[12]  Enzo Pasquale Scilingo,et al.  Performance evaluation of sensing fabrics for monitoring physiological and biomechanical variables , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  S. Carley,et al.  Beyond the 12 lead: review of the use of additional leads for the early electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Emergency medicine.

[14]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing myocardial infarction by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Chris D Nugent,et al.  Mining for diagnostic information in body surface potential maps: A comparison of feature selection techniques , 2005, Biomedical engineering online.

[16]  G. van Herpen,et al.  How many electrodes and where? A "poldermodel" for electrocardiography. , 2002, Journal of electrocardiology.

[17]  G. S. Herman-Giddens,et al.  Selection of the number and positions of measuring locations for electrocardiography. , 1971, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[18]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Jan A. Kors,et al.  How many electrodes and where? A [ldquo ]poldermodel[rdquo ] for electrocardiography , 2002 .

[20]  Chris D. Nugent,et al.  Selection of optimal recording sites for limited lead body surface potential mapping: A sequential selection based approach , 2006, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[21]  David M. Mirvis,et al.  Body Surface Electrocardiographic Mapping , 2012, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[22]  J. A. Abildskov,et al.  Limited Lead Selection for Estimation of Body Surface Potential Maps in Electrocardiography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Chris D Nugent,et al.  Optimizing the 12-lead electrocardiogram: a data driven approach to locating alternative recording sites. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[24]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing anterior and inferior myocardial infarction by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  Frank N. Wilson,et al.  Electrocardiographic Leads Which Record Potential Variations Produced by the Heart Beat at a Single Point , 1932 .

[26]  Fabrice Axisa,et al.  Flexible technologies and smart clothing for citizen medicine, home healthcare, and disease prevention , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[27]  J. Liebman What's old, what's new--in nonarrhythmia clinical electrocardiography: plenary address. , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.

[28]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making Assessing the Level of Healthcare Information Technology Adoption in the United States: a Snapshot , 2005 .

[29]  R Hoekema On selecting a body surface mapping procedure*1 , 1999 .