Some Aspects of the Embryology of Behavior

In the past, the development of behavior in vertebrate embryos has been interpreted in terms of two opposing viewpoints. Coghill, on the basis of his observations on the salamander Ambystoma, has maintained that behavior represents an integrated pattern from beginning to end; partial patterns segregate from total patterns by a developmental process which he calls "individuation." The opposing view, advocated by Windle and other students of the behavior of mammalian embryos and fetuses, contends that local reflexes are the elementary units of behavior that combine secondarily to form integrated patterns. The conceptual and factual foundations of both theories are reappraised, and their limitations and shortcomings are indicated. It becomes evident that Coghill's concepts, derived from lower forms, cannot be generalized and extended to higher forms. On the other hand, the reflexogenic theory is unacceptable on theoretical and factual grounds. A reinvestigation of the embryology of behavior in the chick embryo has provided a new frame of reference that places the problem in a different perspective. An old observation of Preyer (1885) to the effect that overt motility is in operation several days before reflex circuits are formed has been followed up, and, in a series of observations and experiments, spontaneous, nonreflexogenic motility was established as a basic component of embryonic behavior. In can be shown that spontaneous motility patterns are not influenced by sensory input. Arguments are presented in favor of the idea that the spontaneous motility in the chick embryo is due to automatic, self-generated activity of neurons rather than to stimulation by agents in the circulation. One of the most significant characteristics of spontaneous motility is its rhythmicity: short phases of activity are followed by longer phases of inactivity. The analysis of recordings of the periodicity in normal embryos and in embryos with transected spinal cords has enabled us to dissociate a trigger mechanism for activation of motility from a device that determines the duration of the activity phases. Spontaneous and reflexogenic motility are regarded as two independent basic constituents of embryonic behavior. The former is considered to be the primary component, not only because it precedes the reflex responses in lower forms but mainly because reflex motility remains latent in the embryo owing to the absence of adequate stimuli; therefore, it cannot contribute to the molding of behavior patterns in prehatching and prenatal stages.

[1]  E. Churchill.  Appendix: rhythmic functions in the living system. , 1962, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  T. Humphrey.  The spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in human embryos between 7½ and 8½ weeks of menstrual age and its relation to early fetal behavior , 1952, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[4]  V. Hamburger,et al.  Observations and experiments on spontaneous rhythmical behavior in the chick embryo. , 1963, Developmental biology.

[5]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  Manual of Child Psychology , 1947, Pediatrics.

[6]  A. Cunningham.  Qualitative Behavior of Spontaneous Potentials from Explants of 15 Day Chick Embryo Telencephalon in Vitro , 1962, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  Z. Kuo.  Total pattern or local reflexes. , 1939 .

[8]  C. S. Bridgman,et al.  An Experimental Study of the onset of Behavior in the Fetal Guinea-Pig , 1935 .

[9]  C. Herrick.  George Ellett Coghill, Naturalist and Philosopher. , 1950 .

[10]  A. Gonźlez,et al.  The prenatal development of behavior in the albino rat , 1932 .

[11]  Z. Kuo.  Studies in the physiology of the embryonic nervous system. I. Effect of curare on motor activity of the chick embryo , 1939 .

[12]  G. E. Coghill,et al.  Anatomy and the Problem of Behaviour , 1929, Nature.

[13]  D. H. Barron,et al.  The development of behavior in foetal sheep , 1939 .

[14]  Z. Kuo.  Studies in the physiology of the embryonic nervous system. II. Experimental evidence on the controversy over the reflex theory in development , 1939 .

[15]  B. Glass.  Biochemistry of the Developing Nervous System , 1956 .

[16]  V. Hamburger.  ONTOGENY OF BEHAVIOUR AND ITS STRUCTURAL BASIS , 1964 .

[17]  G. Coghill.  THE EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF BEHAVIOR IN AMBLYSTOMA AND IN MAN , 1929 .

[18]  W. F. Windle.  Genesis of Somatic Motor Function in Mammalian Embryos: A Synthesizing Article , 1944, Physiological Zoology.

[19]  H. C. Tracy,et al.  The development of motility and behavior reactions in the toadfish (Opsanus tau) , 1926 .

[20]  W. F. Windle,et al.  Observations on embryonic and fetal movements of the cat , 1931 .

[21]  V. Hamburger.  A Manual Of Experimental Embryology , 1942 .

[22]  S. Crain,et al.  Bioelectric Activity in Long-Term Cultures of Spinal Cord Tissues , 1963, Science.

[23]  D. Drachman,et al.  Experimental clubfoot and arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. , 1962, Lancet.

[24]  L. Carmichael.  The onset and early development of behavior. , 1946 .

[25]  Z. Kuo.  Ontogeny of embryonic behavior in Aves. I. The chronology and general nature of the behavior of the chick embryo , 1932 .

[26]  D. H. Barron.  THE FUNCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOME MAMMALIAN NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISMS , 1941 .

[27]  V. Hamburger,et al.  The Primary Development of the Skeleton in Nerveless and Poorly Innervated Limb Transplants of Chick Embryos , 1940, Physiological Zoology.

[28]  T. Bullock.  THE ORIGINS OF PATTERNED NERVOUS DISCHARGE , 1961 .

[29]  J. Harris,et al.  Structure and Function in the Locomotory System of the Dogfish Embryo. The Myogenic Stage of Movement , 1954 .

[30]  G. E. Coghill,et al.  Somatic Myogenic Action in Embryos of Fundulus Heteroclitus , 1933 .

[31]  E. Adrian.  Potential changes in the isolated nervous system of Dytiscus marginalis , 1931, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Davenport Hooker,et al.  The prenatal origin of behavior , 1952 .

[33]  T. Bullock.  INTEGRATION AND RHYTHMICITY IN NEURAL SYSTEMS , 1962 .

[34]  H. Holtzer,et al.  Development of local coordination centers. I. Brachial centers in the salamander spinal cord , 1956 .

[35]  Joseph J. Peters,et al.  Chronological Development of Electrical Activity in the Optic Lobes, Cerebellum, and Cerebrum of the Chick Embryo , 1960, Physiological Zoology.

[36]  W. F. Windle,et al.  The development of behavior in chick embryos: The appearance of somatic movements , 1934 .