Conventional implicature revisited
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Francescotti. Even: The conventional implicature approach reconsidered , 1995 .
[2] John Perry,et al. Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference , 1987 .
[3] J. Perry. Reference and Reflexivity , 2001 .
[4] G. Frege. On Sense and Reference , 1948 .
[5] H. Grice. Logic and conversation , 1975 .
[6] Steven Rieber,et al. Conventional Implicatures as Tacit Performatives , 1997 .
[7] Michael Glanzberg. Presuppositions, Truth Values, and Expressing Propositions , 2005 .
[8] G. Rota. Presupposition and non-truth-conditional semantics: D. Wilson, Academic Press, 1975, 161 pp. , 1977 .
[9] William G. Lycan,et al. Even and even if , 1991 .
[10] Deirdre Wilson,et al. Presuppositions And Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics , 1975 .
[11] Gerald Gazdar,et al. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .
[12] D. Blakemore. Denial and contrast: A relevance theoretic analysis ofbut , 1989 .
[13] Christopher Potts. The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .
[14] K. Bach. The Myth of Conventional Implicature , 1999 .
[15] V. Klenk. Understanding Symbolic Logic , 1983 .
[16] P. Unger,et al. Semantics and Philosophy , 1974 .
[17] Stephen Barker. Truth and Conventional Implicature , 2003 .
[18] C. Iten. Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance , 2005 .
[19] R. Vallée. Complex Demonstratives, Articulation, and Overarticulation , 2005, Dialogue.