Analysis of the effects of fitting errors of DCE-CT signals on perfusion parameters

Computed Tomography perfusion (CTp) is a promising technique for estimating perfusion parameters, by analysing Time Concentration Curves (TCCs) of the administered contrast agent. However, several artefacts can degrade the signal quality, jeopardizing quantitative measurements. Despite different methods exploit TCCs to compute perfusion parameters, none of them has investigated how TCC fitting errors may affect final perfusion values. The first goal of this work is to investigate residuals distributions in significant signal's portions, then relating them to Blood Flow (BF). The Gamma Variate (GV) function is addressed to fit TCCs. Voxel-based BF is computed with the two most spread methods in literature, Maximum Slope (MS) and Deconvolution (DV). Experimental results prove that residuals coming from a Gaussian distribution yield percent errors maps locally smooth, thus attaining residuals-independent BF values. Besides results, the methodological approach can be spent in future researches in order to encourage CTp reproducibility.

[1]  Yi-Hsuan Kao,et al.  Automatic measurements of arterial input and venous output functions on cerebral computed tomography perfusion images: A preliminary study , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[2]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Automatic detection of misleading blood flow values in CT perfusion studies of lung cancer , 2016, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[3]  A K Dixon,et al.  Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. , 1993, Radiology.

[4]  Agostino Gibaldi,et al.  Effects of guided random sampling of TCCs on blood flow values in CT perfusion studies of lung tumors. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[5]  R. Davenport The derivation of the gamma-variate relationship for tracer dilution curves. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  G. Frija,et al.  Deconvolution technique for measuring tissue perfusion by dynamic CT: application to normal and metastatic liver. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[7]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Quantitative assessment of effects of motion compensation for liver and lung tumors in CT perfusion. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[8]  Julia F. Barrett,et al.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  A novel algorithm to detect the baseline value of a time signal in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Computed Tomography , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[10]  A. Chandler,et al.  Reproducibility of CT perfusion parameters in liver tumors and normal liver. , 2011, Radiology.

[11]  M. P. Hayball,et al.  Current status and guidelines for the assessment of tumour vascular support with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography , 2012, European Radiology.

[12]  A. Häkkinen,et al.  Assessment of vascular physiology of tumorous livers: comparison of two different methods. , 2003, Academic radiology.