Inclusive Ecosystem Services Valuation

Abstract This chapter discusses the concept of ecosystem services valuation. It argues that beyond monetary valuation, ES valuation should also take into account ecological and social values. Valuation should be geared toward strong sustainability in order to improve the well-being of every individual and society, now and in the future. Following a systemic approach, bundles of ES should be valued together. When systems are far from critical thresholds, valuing changes through various alternatives is appropriate. Deliberative multicriteria decision tools could be appropriate to collectively value ES. However, when systems are close to thresholds or tipping points, ecosystem service valuation will need to switch from choosing among resources or alternatives to valuing the avoidance of catastrophic ecosystem change. Finally, it is important to remember that valuation is merely a tool and not a solution in itself. When one is valuing for sustainability, the questions of politics, governance, and institutions cannot be ignored.

[1]  C. Kremen Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[2]  M. F. van de Kerkhof,et al.  A dialogue approach to enhance learning for sustainability—A Dutch experiment with two participatory methods in the field of climate change , 2006 .

[3]  V. Reyes‐García,et al.  Beyond food production : home gardens as biocultural conservation agents : a case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, northeastern Spain , 2012 .

[4]  Jan Staes,et al.  EBI: An index for delivery of ecosystem service bundles , 2014 .

[5]  E. Corbera,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism , 2010 .

[6]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[7]  L. François,et al.  Towards participatory integrated valuation and modelling of ecosystem services under land-use change , 2014 .

[8]  Matthew A. Wilson,et al.  A Theoretical Approach to Deliberative Valuation: Aggregation by Mutual Consent , 2006, Land Economics.

[9]  J. Farley Steady state economics , 2014 .

[10]  J. Gowdy,et al.  What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay , 2013 .

[11]  J. Harte,et al.  The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Complex systems and valuation , 2002 .

[13]  Arild Vatn,et al.  Institutions And The Environment , 2005 .

[14]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  Recent Developments in Fisheries Economics: An Introduction , 2007, Land Economics.

[15]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[16]  Pete Smith,et al.  UK National Ecosystem Assessment:Technical report , 2011 .

[17]  R. Norgaard Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. , 1994 .

[18]  V. Maris,et al.  From Adaptive Management to Adjustive Management: A Pragmatic Account of Biodiversity Values , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[19]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services § , 2010 .

[20]  J. Martínez-Alier,et al.  Weak Comparability of Values as a Foundation for Ecological Economics , 1998 .

[21]  H. Keune,et al.  Negotiated Complexity in Ecosystem Services Science and Policy Making , 2013 .

[22]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Endogenous Preferences, Environmental Law , 1993, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[24]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[25]  R. Norgaard Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder , 2010 .

[26]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Rationality and Social Choice , 1995 .

[27]  C. Spash How Much is that Ecosystem in the Window? The One with the Bio-diverse Trail , 2008 .

[28]  A. Vatn An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal , 2009 .

[29]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning , 2013 .

[30]  C. Barnaud,et al.  Vers une mise en débat des incertitudes associées à la notion de service écosystémique , 2011 .

[31]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science , 1994 .

[32]  J. Gonzalez,et al.  Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  R. Costanza Social Goals and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services , 2000, Ecosystems.

[34]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[35]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[36]  A. Markandya,et al.  Ecosystem Services and Their Monetary Value , 2013 .

[37]  A. Simms Ecological Debt: The Health of the Planet and the Wealth of Nations , 2005 .

[38]  Herman E. Daly,et al.  Allocation, distribution, and scale: towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable , 1992 .

[39]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[40]  K. Arrow,et al.  The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value , 2000, Science.

[41]  A. Vatn The Environment as a Commodity , 2000 .

[42]  Claude A. Garcia,et al.  What Defines Quality of Life? The Gap Between Public Policies and Locally Defined Indicators Among Residents of Kodagu, Karnataka (India) , 2014 .