A parallel kinematic mechanism for the torso of a humanoid robot: Design, construction and validation

The torso of a humanoid robot is a fundamental part of its kinematic structure because it defines the reachable workspace, supports the entire upper-body and can be used to control the position of the center of mass. The majority of the torso joints are designed exploiting serial or differential mechanisms, while parallel kinematic structures are less used mainly because of their greater design complexity. This paper describes the design and construction of a 4 degrees of freedom (DoF) torso for our new humanoid robot. Three degrees of freedom, namely roll, pitch and heave, have been implemented using a 3 DoF parallel kinematic structure, while the fourth DoF, namely yaw, has been implemented with a rotational joint on top of the parallel structure. The design has been optimized to reduce the cost and the volume of the system. A first prototype of the torso has been constructed and validated with respect to our design requirements. Eventually, experimental tests have been conducted to assess the functionality of the proposed system.

[1]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Design Approach of Biologically-Inspired Musculoskeletal Humanoids , 2013 .

[2]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Human mimetic musculoskeletal humanoid Kengoro toward real world physically interactive actions , 2016, 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[3]  D. Stewart,et al.  A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[4]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Dynamic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition , 2008, PerMIS.

[6]  Aaron D. Ames,et al.  Valkyrie: NASA's First Bipedal Humanoid Robot , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[7]  Mitsuharu Morisawa,et al.  Humanoid robot HRP-4 - Humanoid robotics platform with lightweight and slim body , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Marco Ceccarelli,et al.  LARM PKM solutions for torso design in humanoid robots , 2014 .

[9]  H. Ulbrich,et al.  System Design and Control of Anthropomorphic Walking Robot LOLA , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[10]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Lower Body Design of the `iCub' a Human-baby like Crawling Robot , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[11]  Albert Albers,et al.  Design of a New Torso-Joint for the Humanoid Robot ARMAR , 2012 .

[12]  Dimitri Lefebvre,et al.  Comparison of serial and parallel robot repeatability based on different performance criteria , 2013 .

[13]  Giorgio Metta,et al.  The design and validation of the R1 personal humanoid , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[14]  Sébastien Briot,et al.  ARE PARALLEL ROBOTS MORE ACCURATE THAN SERIAL ROBOTS , 2007 .

[15]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Kinematic analysis of a three degrees of freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.