Predicting creativity in the wild: experience sample and sociometric modeling of teams

Relationships between creativity in teamwork, and team members' movement and face-to-face interaction strength were investigated "in the wild" using sociometric badges (wearable sensors), electronic Experience Sampling Methods (ESM), the KEYS team creativity assessment instrument, and qualitative methods, in academic and industry settings. Activities (movement and face-to-face interaction) and creativity of one five-member and two seven-member teams were tracked for twenty-five days, eleven days, and fifteen days respectively. Paired-sample t-test confirmed average daily movement energy during creative days was significantly greater than on non-creative days and that face-to-face interaction tie strength of team members during creative days was significantly greater than for non-creative days. The combined approach of principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) conducted on movement and face-to-face interaction data yielded a model that predicted creativity with 87.5% and 91% accuracy, respectively. Computational models that predict team creativity hold particular promise to enhance Creativity Support Tools.

[1]  Walter Bender,et al.  Group Reactions to Visual Feedback Tools , 2007, PERSUASIVE.

[2]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Social networks, personal values, and creativity: evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[4]  S. Taggar Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[5]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Gery W. Ryan,et al.  Behavior Sampling and Ethnography: Complementary Methods for Understanding Home-School Connections among Latino Immigrant Families , 2001 .

[7]  Michelle Li Wei Kam,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Centrality and Tie Strength on Performance in Face-to-Face Networks , 2010 .

[8]  Gilly Leshed,et al.  Automated language-based feedback for teamwork behaviors , 2009 .

[9]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  Automatic prediction of frustration , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  A. Pentland Automatic mapping and modeling of human networks , 2007 .

[12]  Alex Pentl,et al.  Reality Mining of Mobile Communications: Toward A New Deal On Data , 2009 .

[13]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[14]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[15]  Edward J. Bedrick,et al.  Testing the Independence Assumption in Linear Models , 1997 .

[16]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes , 2001 .

[17]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Supporting creativity with awareness in distributed collaboration , 2007, GROUP.

[18]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[19]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[20]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Analyzing data from individuals in groups: The past, the present, and the future. , 2001 .

[21]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[22]  Julian Warner,et al.  Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies , 2006, J. Documentation.

[23]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[24]  Ken Perlin,et al.  A platform for affective agent research , 2004 .

[25]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Predicting creativity in the wild: experience sampling method and sociometric modeling of movement and face-to-face interactions in teams , 2011 .

[26]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Capturing Individual and Group Behavior with Wearable Sensors , 2009, AAAI Spring Symposium: Human Behavior Modeling.

[27]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Affect and Creativity at Work , 2005 .

[28]  L. Mann,et al.  The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time , 2004 .

[29]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Sandra E. Moritz,et al.  Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. , 1998 .

[31]  R. Mayer Handbook of Creativity: Fifty Years of Creativity Research , 1998 .

[32]  Alex Pentland Socially Aware Computation and Communication , 2005, Computer.

[33]  R. Sternberg Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[34]  Archana Singh-Manoux,et al.  Effects of physical activity on cognitive functioning in middle age: evidence from the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[35]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[36]  D. Kahneman,et al.  A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method , 2004, Science.

[37]  Taemie Kim,et al.  Enhancing Organizational Communication using Sociometric Badges , 2007 .

[38]  Baojun Zhao,et al.  Face Recognition Based on PCA and LDA Combination Feature Extraction , 2009, 2009 First International Conference on Information Science and Engineering.

[39]  Nathan Eagle,et al.  Machine perception and learning of complex social systems , 2005 .

[40]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. , 1995 .

[41]  Brenda Massetti,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Value of Creativity Support Systems on Idea Generation , 1996, MIS Q..

[42]  Charles M. Judd,et al.  Overcoming Dependent Data: A Guide to the Analysis of Group Data , 2008 .

[43]  Sandra Ohly,et al.  Networks for generating and for validating ideas: The social side of creativity , 2010 .

[44]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[45]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[46]  Sumit Basu,et al.  Conversational scene analysis , 2002 .

[47]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace , 1993 .

[48]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Gait analysis for recognition and classification , 2002, Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition.

[49]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[50]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[53]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2001 .

[54]  Khalid Choudhury,et al.  Sensing and Modeling Human Networks by Tanzeem , 2003 .

[55]  J. Guilford The structure of intellect. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creativity support tools , 2002, CACM.