Relational and Attributive Activity in Virtual Communities-Working Paper-October 2004

Although Virtual Communities (ViCs) have been considered as an important e-commerce instrument, little is known about their evolution and the changes in the communication activity of its users. A frequent finding is that a small number of the participants is responsible for the majority of messages and, in contrast, a large portion of the users only write one or a few message(s). This discrepancy deserves more attention. In this paper, the heterogeneity of the communication activity is examined longitudinally on the basis of the graph-theoretical models “Random Network Theory” and “Scale-free Networks”. The fusion of these two models allows operationalization of the heterogeneity of the relational as well as the attributive communication activity in ViCs. The adjustment of the empirical distribution functions of the examined ViCs to this model shows a predominance of preferential over uniform binding. This “rich get richer phenomenon” proves temporally stable and leads to the emergence of heterogeneity of the member’s activities. We conclude that instead of stimulating all participants, it appears to be more promising to address the lead users as a main target. Their attachments to other users may be utilized in a positive and amplifying way in order increase a community’s communication activity. References: virtual communities, social network analysis, graph theory, heterogeneity of communication activity, “Degree”-distribution, preferential binding, uniform binding, “Scalefree Networks“.

[1]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Computer as a Communication Device , 1968 .

[2]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[3]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[4]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Studying Online Social Networks , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Robert H. Zakon,et al.  Hobbes' Internet Timeline , 1997, RFC.

[6]  B. Wellman An electronic group is virtually a social network. , 1997 .

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[8]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Conversation as Publishing: the Role of News Forums on the Web , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  User population and user contributions to virtual publics: a systems model , 1999, GROUP.

[10]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[11]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Persistence and lurkers in discussion lists: a pilot study , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[13]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Genre taxonomy: A knowledge repository of communicative actions , 2001, TOIS.

[14]  Gregor Schrott,et al.  Virtual Communities , 2001, Wirtschaftsinf..

[15]  C. Stegbauer Grenzen virtueller Gemeinschaft , 2001 .

[16]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[17]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Winners don't take all: Characterizing the competition for links on the web , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Online communities: a longitudinal analysis of communication activities , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[19]  Loren Terveen,et al.  The Dynamics of Mass Interaction , 2003, From Usenet to CoWebs.

[20]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Cohesion and roles: network analysis of CSCL communities , 2003, Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.

[21]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[22]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Asynchronous discussion groups as Small World and Scale Free Networks , 2004, First Monday.