Multimodal Sparse Classifier for Adolescent Brain Age Prediction

The study of healthy brain development helps to better understand both brain transformation and connectivity patterns, which happen during childhood to adulthood. This study presents a sparse machine learning solution across whole-brain functional connectivity measures of three datasets, derived from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and two task fMRI data including a working memory n-back task (nb-fMRI) and an emotion identification task (em-fMRI). The fMRI data are collected from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) for the prediction of brain age in adolescents. Due to extremely large variable-to-instance ratio of PNC data, a high-dimensional matrix with several irrelevant and highly correlated features is generated, and hence a sparse learning approach is necessary to extract effective features from fMRI data. We propose a sparse learner based on the residual errors along the estimation of an inverse problem for extreme learning machine (ELM). Our proposed method is able to overcome the overlearning problem by pruning several redundant features and their corresponding output weights. The proposed multimodal sparse ELM classifier based on residual errors is highly competitive in terms of classification accuracy compared to its counterparts such as conventional ELM, and sparse Bayesian learning ELM.

[1]  Li Xiao,et al.  Alternating Diffusion Map Based Fusion of Multimodal Brain Connectivity Networks for IQ Prediction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Prediction of brain maturity in infants using machine-learning algorithms , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Nathan Intrator,et al.  Learning as Extraction of Low-Dimensional Representations , 1997 .

[6]  A. Booth Numerical Methods , 1957, Nature.

[7]  Max Planitz Numerical methods, software and analysis, 2nd edition , 1994 .

[8]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Extreme learning machine: a new learning scheme of feedforward neural networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[10]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Li Yao,et al.  Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment Conversion Using a Combination of Independent Component Analysis and the Cox Model , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Chee Kheong Siew,et al.  Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[14]  Tongsheng Zhang,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine-Based Classification of ADHD Using Brain Structural MRI Data , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Alexej Gossmann,et al.  FDR-Corrected Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis With Applications to Imaging Genomics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Yang Qin,et al.  QR factorization based Incremental Extreme Learning Machine with growth of hidden nodes , 2015, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  Vijay K. Venkatraman,et al.  Neuroanatomical Assessment of Biological Maturity , 2012, Current Biology.

[18]  James V. Stone Independent Component Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction , 2007 .

[19]  Giovanni Montana,et al.  Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker , 2016, NeuroImage.

[20]  Euntai Kim,et al.  Pseudoinverse Matrix Decomposition Based Incremental Extreme Learning Machine with Growth of Hidden Nodes , 2016, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst..

[21]  Carl D. Meyer,et al.  Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra , 2000 .

[22]  Gareth Ball,et al.  Modelling neuroanatomical variation during childhood and adolescence with neighbourhood-preserving embedding , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Healing the relevance vector machine through augmentation , 2005, ICML.

[24]  A. James,et al.  Meta-analysis of regional white matter volume in bipolar disorder with replication in an independent sample using coordinates, T-maps, and individual MRI data , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[26]  Tuan D. Pham,et al.  MRI-based age prediction using hidden Markov models , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Paul M Thompson,et al.  Diffusion MRI in pediatric brain injury , 2017, Child's Nervous System.

[28]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Enforcing Co-Expression Within a Brain-Imaging Genomics Regression Framework , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Importance of Multimodal MRI in Characterizing Brain Tissue and Its Potential Application for Individual Age Prediction , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[30]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Imaging patterns of brain development and their relationship to cognition. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Multi-modal, Multi-measure, and Multi-class Discrimination of ADHD with Hierarchical Feature Extraction and Extreme Learning Machine Using Structural and Functional Brain MRI , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[32]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Gene Expression and Copy Number Data on Gene Shaving Using Independent Component Analysis , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[33]  J. Vandewalle,et al.  Analysis and properties of the generalized total least squares problem AX≈B when some or all columns in A are subject to error , 1989 .

[34]  Åke Björck,et al.  Numerical Methods , 2021, Markov Renewal and Piecewise Deterministic Processes.

[35]  George Eastman House,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001 .

[36]  G. Sreedhar Web Data Mining and the Development of Knowledge-Based Decision Support Systems , 2016 .

[37]  Chi-Man Vong,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Extreme Learning Machine for Multi-classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[38]  Jenessa Lancaster,et al.  Bayesian Optimization for Neuroimaging Pre-processing in Brain Age Classification and Prediction , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..