Advancing Our Understanding of Team Motivation

Although research on team motivation has been one of the fastest growing research domains in organizational science, progress in this domain has been hampered by a lack of integrative reviews. Thus, we develop a theoretical framework in this article to summarize and discuss different conceptual approaches to team motivation for the following six content areas: team design, team needs, team goals, team self-regulation, team efficacy, and team affect. Our framework organizes previous research according to two dimensions. First, we assess the degree of interdependence between team members’ motivational states, differentiating between models that conceptualize team motivation as functionally equivalent to individual level motivation and models that conceptualize team motivation as a truly collective phenomenon. Second, we assess the extent to which research conceptualizes team motivation as a dynamic phenomenon that evolves over time, with static models of team motivation and dynamic models of team motivation demarcating the opposite ends of this continuum. With this framework, we show that previous research on team motivation has overemphasized conceptual similarities between motivation constructs at the individual and team levels of analysis. We address this shortcoming by developing a theory of interdependent regulatory dynamics. This theory emphasizes the interdependent and dynamic nature of team motivation. It depicts the processes in which team members decide how to allocate their efforts and resources between individual goals and team goals, and it identifies the multiple pathways through which teams coordinate and regulate their collective efforts over time.

[1]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[2]  W. Mackenzie,et al.  The Management and the Worker , 2008 .

[3]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[5]  William L. Gardner,et al.  Transition to self-directed work teams: implications of transition time and self-monitoring for managers' use of influence tactics , 2004 .

[6]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Group Pay-For-Performance Plans: The Role of Spontaneous Goal Setting , 2000 .

[7]  Wendy P. van Ginkel,et al.  The Interactive Effects of Mood and Trait Negative Affect in Group Decision Making , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[8]  R. Larsen,et al.  Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. , 1992 .

[9]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[10]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Empowering Leadership in Management Teams: Effects on Knowledge Sharing, Efficacy, And Performance , 2006 .

[11]  A. Zander Motives & goals in groups , 1996 .

[12]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[13]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Self-regulation and multiple deadline goals. , 2008 .

[14]  M. Riggs,et al.  The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: a causal model. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives , 1990 .

[16]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Handbook of Self-Determination Research , 2002 .

[18]  Justin M. Weinhardt,et al.  A Formal, Computational Theory of Multiple-goal Pursuit: Integrating Goal-choice and Goal-striving Processes We Thank Allison Tenbrink for Helping to Classify the Data, Sheng Liu for Helping with the Modeling, And , 2022 .

[19]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Interdependence: Implications for Real Teams and Working Groups , 2007 .

[20]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Relationship of Team Goals, Incentives, and Efficacy to Strategic Risk, Tactical Implementation, and Performance , 2001 .

[21]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Explaining affective linkages in teams: individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism-collectivism. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Gilad Chen,et al.  A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. , 2006 .

[23]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Esteem maintenance among groups: Laboratory and field studies of group performance cognitions , 2004 .

[24]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[25]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  PATTERNS OF INTERDEPENDENCE IN WORK TEAMS: A TWO‐LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONS WITH JOB AND TEAM SATISFACTION , 2001 .

[28]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  EFFICACY DISPERSION IN TEAMS: MOVING BEYOND AGREEMENT AND AGGREGATION , 2010 .

[29]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[30]  C. Gibson,et al.  Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[32]  D. Chan Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[33]  Heike Bruch,et al.  Chapter 3 Investigating the Emotional Basis of Charismatic Leadership: The Role of Leaders’ Positive Mood and Emotional Intelligence , 2007 .

[34]  J. Forward,et al.  Internal-external control and black militancy , 1970 .

[35]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Why Does Affect Matter in Organizations , 2007 .

[36]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social Identity, Self-categorization, and Work Motivation: Rethinking the Contribution of the Group to Positive and Sustainable Organisational Outcomes , 2000 .

[37]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[38]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[39]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Behavior in Organizations: The Third Scientific Discipline , 2000 .

[40]  A. Somech,et al.  Team conflict management and team effectiveness: the effects of task interdependence and team identification , 2009 .

[41]  Andreas Schwab,et al.  Learning in Hybrid-Project Systems: The Effects of Project Performance on Repeated Collaboration , 2008 .

[42]  Ruth Wageman,et al.  As the Twig Is Bent: How Group Values Shape Emergent Task Interdependence in Groups , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Howard L. Fromkin,et al.  Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference , 1980 .

[44]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Knowing good from bad: the paradox of neuroticism, negative affect, and evaluative processing. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Ad Kleingeld,et al.  The effect of goal setting on group performance: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  Marshall Schminke,et al.  Assembling Fragments Into a Lens: A Review, Critique, and Proposed Research Agenda for the Organizational Work Climate Literature , 2009 .

[47]  C. Rutte Solving organizational social dilemmas , 1990 .

[48]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Individual and Group Feedback and Performance: An Attributional Perspective , 1991 .

[49]  Mark A. Griffin,et al.  Identifying Group Task Satisfaction at Work , 2003 .

[50]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  EMPLOYEES THAT THINK AND ACT LIKE OWNERS: EFFECTS OF OWNERSHIP BELIEFS AND BEHAVIORS ON ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS , 2003 .

[51]  Marilyn L. Fox,et al.  Job Design , 1997 .

[52]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[53]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Claus W. Langfred The paradox of self‐management: individual and group autonomy in work groups , 2000 .

[55]  R. Kark,et al.  Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow: The Role of the Self-Regulatory Focus in Leadership Processes , 2007 .

[56]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  “Strength and Safety in Numbers”: A Theoretical Perspective on Group Influences on Approach and Avoidance Motivation , 2006 .

[57]  Henry Moon ASYMMETRIC ADAPTABILITY : DYNAMIC TEAM STRUCTURES AS ONE-WAY STREETS , 2004 .

[58]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  John M. Levine,et al.  Development of Strategic Norms in Groups , 2000 .

[60]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[61]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[62]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Mood and Emotions in Small Groups and Work Teams , 2001 .

[63]  Christopher O. L. H. Porter,et al.  When Does Teamwork Translate Into Improved Team Performance? A Resource Allocation Perspective , 2010 .

[64]  M. Deutsch A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[65]  R. I. Sutton,et al.  Organizational behavior: linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Ceo Transformational Leadership: The Role of Goal Importance Congruence in Top Management Teams , 2008 .

[67]  A. Zander,et al.  Motives and goals in groups , 1971 .

[68]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[69]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[70]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  D. Ilgen,et al.  Motivation in Work Teams , 2012 .

[72]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description , 2012 .

[73]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[74]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[75]  Christopher O. L. H. Porter,et al.  Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[77]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[78]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[79]  H. S. Feild,et al.  Team Goal Orientation and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Planning , 2009 .

[80]  M. Wertheimer Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[81]  A. Schmidt,et al.  The role of feedback, casual attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  Kristin Behfar,et al.  The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study , 2003 .

[83]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  How Relational and Organizational Identification Converge: Processes and Conditions , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[84]  David C. Croson,et al.  Information Policy: Shaping the Value of Agency Relationships , 2001 .

[85]  G. Seijts,et al.  The development of collective efficacy in teams: a multilevel and longitudinal perspective. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[86]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Automatic goal inferences. , 2005 .

[87]  D. Watson Mood and temperament , 2000 .

[88]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Participative Decision Making and Employee Performance in Different Cultures: The Moderating Effects of Allocentrism/Idiocentrism and Efficacy , 2002 .

[89]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer's (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams , 2009 .

[90]  David Holman,et al.  Affect networks: a structural analysis of the relationship between work ties and job-related affect. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[91]  Caroline A. Bartel,et al.  The Collective Construction of Work Group Moods , 2000 .

[92]  C. D. De Dreu Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[93]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[94]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures , 2009 .

[95]  C. Gibson Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures , 1999 .

[96]  J. Lepine Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[97]  B. West,et al.  Team level positivity: investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes , 2009 .

[98]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service. , 1995 .

[99]  J. T. Austin,et al.  Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. , 1996 .

[100]  Sigal G. Barsade The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group Behavior , 2002 .

[101]  J. Mathieu,et al.  VALIDATING FROGS AND PONDS IN MULTI-LEVEL CONTEXTS: SOME AFTERTHOUGHTS , 2005 .

[102]  Erich C. Dierdorff,et al.  The power of "we": effects of psychological collectivism on team performance over time. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[103]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[104]  B. Kotkov Motivation: Theory And Research , 1965 .

[105]  R. Saavedra,et al.  The contagious leader: impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[106]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[107]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Work Motivation: Directing, Energizing, and Maintaining Effort (and Research) , 2012 .

[108]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[109]  Wendy P. van Ginkel,et al.  Diversity in goal orientation, team reflexivity, and team performance , 2011 .

[110]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Performance Implications of Peer Monitoring , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[111]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[112]  G. Latham,et al.  Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[113]  Lisa Dragoni,et al.  Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: the role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[114]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Cutthroat Cooperation: Asymmetrical Adaptation To Changes In Team Reward Structures , 2006 .

[115]  P. Pintrich Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. , 2000 .

[116]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Power Asymmetry and Learning in Teams: The Moderating Role of Performance Feedback , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[117]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[118]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  To Your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams , 2000 .

[119]  H. Lewis An experimental study of the role of the ego in work. I. The role of the ego in coöperative work. , 1944 .

[120]  J. Forgas Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[121]  C. Alderfer An empirical test of a new theory of human needs , 1969 .

[122]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Can Confidence Come Too Soon? Collective Efficacy, Conflict and Group Performance over Time. , 2010 .

[123]  A. Erez,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROTATED LEADERSHIP AND PEER EVALUATION ON THE FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF‐MANAGED TEAMS: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[124]  E. Salas,et al.  Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. , 1996 .

[125]  Chi-yue Chiu,et al.  Goal commitment and alignment of personal goals predict group identification only when the goals are shared , 2012 .

[126]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[127]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy , 2003 .

[128]  R. DeShon,et al.  A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[129]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Toward a Systems Theory of Motivated Behavior in Work Teams , 2006 .

[130]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes , 2010 .

[131]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Informational Dissimilarity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Intrateam Interdependence and Team Identification , 2003 .

[132]  Aileen B. Sedman,et al.  A longitudinal study , 1987 .

[133]  F. Tschan,et al.  Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models , 2007 .

[134]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .

[135]  Jeffrey Sanchez-Burks,et al.  Emotional Aperture and Strategic Change: The Accurate Recognition of Collective Emotions , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[136]  Michael Frese,et al.  The affective shift model of work engagement. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[137]  Heike Bruch,et al.  Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[138]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  Motivation: Theory and research. , 1964 .

[139]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Extending the Multilevel Theory of Team Decision Making: Effects of Feedback and Experience in Hierarchical Teams , 1998 .

[140]  Maja O’Connor LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 2013 .

[141]  A. Elliot,et al.  Achievement Goals and the Hierarchical Model of Achievement Motivation , 2001 .

[142]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design , 2008 .

[143]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[144]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  The epistemic benefits of trait-consistent mood states: an analysis of extraversion and mood. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[145]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[146]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Attributions of the "causes" of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[147]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[148]  S. Voelpel,et al.  WHEN AND HOW DIVERSITY BENEFITS TEAMS: THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM MEMBERS' NEED FOR COGNITION , 2009 .

[149]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, EFFICACY, AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS , 2000 .

[150]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[151]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .