Managing innovation and change processes: Findings from the Minnesota innovation research program

This article describes how innovations develop over time based on findings emerging from seven innovations included in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program. These observations are very different from typical models in the literature of the innovation process. The actual process is fluid, and includes an initial shock to propel the innovation into being, proliferation of the original idea, setbacks and surprises along the way which provide numerous opportunities for learning and failure, and a blending of the old and the new as the innovation is implemented and diffused. This article is one small step in developing descriptively more accurate and useful models of the innovation process based on longitudinal research studies.

[1]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Integrating human resource management and corporate strategy: A preview of the 3M story , 1985 .

[2]  Michael Masuch,et al.  Vicious circles in organizations. , 1985 .

[3]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[4]  M. S. Poole.  Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. , 1983 .

[5]  J. McCann.  Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism , 1980 .

[6]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Problem Solving, Planning, and Innovation. Part I. Test of the Program Planning Model , 1980 .

[7]  R. Ackoff,et al.  Redesigning the Future, a Systems Approach to Societal Problems , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[9]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[10]  C. Gopalan,et al.  Human cataract and galactose metabolism. , 1974, Nutrition and metabolism.

[11]  L. Daele,et al.  INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSITION IN DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS , 1973 .

[12]  J. Friedmann.  Retracking America;: A theory of transactive planning , 1973 .

[13]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[14]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[15]  L. Daele,et al.  Qualitative models in developmental analysis. , 1969 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[17]  H. Helson.  Current trends and issues in adaptation-level theory. , 1964 .

[18]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change , 1959 .

[19]  R. Bales,et al.  Phases in group problem-solving. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[20]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. , 1948, Psychological review.

[21]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[22]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Level of aspiration. , 1944 .

[23]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A History of Mechanical Inventions , 1961, Nature.