Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature

This article examines the nature, role and function of the literature review in academic discourse. Researchers in information systems (IS) are often advised to espouse a neutral viewpoint and adapt the goal of synthesising previous literature when conducting a literature review. However, since research literature in many areas of IS is diverse and heterogeneous, this synthesis is not value neutral, but is a construction of the researchers. We suggest that other goals and viewpoints for reviewing and presenting previous literature are possible, and in some cases, desirable. Using the example of service quality literature, we use a lens of historical discourse, and techniques of soft systems analysis and rich pictures, to present previous research literature on ServQual-related research in IS and electronic commerce. We identify seven ‘stories’ from service quality research literature and analyse the clients, actors, transformations, world-view (weltanschauung), owners and environment in each story. We conclude that alternative presentations of research literature can offer fresh insights, especially in areas where the research literature is diffuse, contradictory and heterogeneous.

[1]  Min Xie,et al.  Factor analysis of service quality dimension shifts in the information age , 2003 .

[2]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[3]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Improving the measurement of service quality , 1993 .

[4]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Exploring a Gap Model of Information Services Quality , 1995 .

[5]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[6]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[7]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Consumer satisfaction with internet shopping: a research framework and propositions for future research , 2005, ICEC '05.

[8]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[9]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[10]  V. Zeithaml Service excellence in electronic channels , 2002 .

[11]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[12]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  Information technology center service quality , 2005 .

[13]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Mobile Business Research Published in 2000-2004: Emergence, Current Status, and Future Opportunities , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Meta-analysis analysis. , 1987 .

[15]  William R. King,et al.  Understanding the Role and Methods of Meta-Analysis in IS Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  S. Durvasula,et al.  Relationships between SERVQUAL dimensions and organizational performance in the case of a business‐to‐business service , 1998 .

[17]  Regis McKenna Total Access: Giving Customers What They Want in an Anytime, Anywhere World , 2002 .

[18]  B. Dale,et al.  Service quality and e‐commerce: an exploratory analysis , 2001 .

[19]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[21]  Lucía Melián Alzola,et al.  Servqual: Its Applicability in Electronic Commerce B2C , 2005 .

[22]  Mary Tate,et al.  Bringing human information behaviour into information systems research: an application of systems modelling , 2004, Inf. Res..

[23]  C. Hart Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. , 1998 .

[24]  BarkiHenri Thar's gold in them thar constructs , 2008 .

[25]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality , 1994 .

[26]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns for a Complete Canvas , 1997, MIS Q..

[27]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[29]  Gary Klein,et al.  Measuring Information System Service Quality: SERVQUAL from the Other Side , 2002, MIS Q..

[30]  Mary Tate,et al.  Descendents of ServQual in Online Services Research: The End of the Line? , 2009, AMCIS.

[31]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[32]  Trina Luciano Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination , 2011 .

[33]  H. Cooper Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews , 1988 .

[34]  Shaun Pather,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce effectiveness: a conceptual model , 2003 .

[35]  R. Teas,et al.  Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: An Assessment of a Reassessment , 1994 .

[36]  Gary Klein,et al.  Resolving Difference Score Issues in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[37]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications , 1994 .

[38]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Christina Soh,et al.  Client satisfaction with outsourced IT services: a transaction-cost approach , 1999, ICIS.

[40]  Susan Heaford Qualitative Research for the Information Professional: A Practical Handbook (2nd ed.) , 2006 .

[41]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[42]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Perceived service quality as a customer‐based performance measure: An empirical examination of organizational barriers using an extended service quality model , 1991 .

[44]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Handbook of marketing , 2002 .

[45]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality , 1988 .

[46]  Tsuang Kuo,et al.  Measuring users' perceived portal service quality: An empirical study , 2005 .

[47]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[48]  Mark P. Leach,et al.  Building customer relations over the Internet , 2002 .

[49]  Mary Tate,et al.  Where are we at with Cloud Computing?: A Descriptive Literature Review , 2009 .

[50]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  HOW DO THEY KNOW THEIR CUSTOMERS SO WELL , 2001 .

[51]  Leonard L. Berry,et al.  Five imperatives for improving service quality , 1991 .

[52]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[53]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[54]  Beverley G. Hope,et al.  Perceived Service Quality in a University Web Portal: Revising the E-Qual Instrument , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[55]  Mark A. McComb The Quality Toolbox , 2008, Technometrics.

[56]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  M. Miles,et al.  The Qualitative Researcher's Companion , 2002 .

[58]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Normative standards for IS research , 1994, DATB.

[59]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Delivering quality service : balancing customer perceptions and expectations , 1990 .

[60]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[61]  Denise E. Agosto Qualitative research for the information professional: A practical handbook , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Postmodernism and Organizational Research , 1997 .

[63]  D. C. oksey C. Eshelman,et al.  The quality toolbox , 1992 .

[64]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Pragmatic Perspectives on the Measurement of Information Systems Service Quality Analysis with LISREL : An Appendix to Pragmatic Perspectives on the Measurement of Information Systems Service Quality , 2002 .

[65]  Neda Abasi,et al.  Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable , 2015 .

[66]  Naceur Jabnoun,et al.  A customized measure of service quality in the UAE , 2005 .

[67]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[68]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Soft systems methodology as a social science research tool , 1997 .

[69]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Concerns on the Use of the SERVQUAL Questionnaire , 1997, MIS Q..

[70]  Daryl J. Bern Writing a Review Article for Psychological Bulletin , 1995 .

[71]  J. Carman Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions , 1990 .

[72]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Service quality delivery through web sites: A critical review of extant knowledge , 2002, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.