The logic of campaign spending in mixed-member electoral systems

[1]  A. Geddis.  Funding New Zealand’s Election Campaigns , 2021, Policy Quarterly.

[2]  Frank C. Thames,et al.  Cross-tier personal gains in mixed electoral systems , 2020, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.

[3]  Zsófia Papp.  Dual candidacy as a source of legislator behaviour. The re-election and the mandate incentive under mixed-member electoral rules , 2019, Acta Politica.

[4]  Martin Battle.  The servant of two masters: Electoral incentives in the Scottish Parliament , 2019, Regional & Federal Studies.

[5]  Siim Trumm.  The best of both worlds? Evaluating the campaign behaviour of dual candidates , 2018, Electoral Studies.

[6]  E. G. Poole.  An electoral calculus? Dual incentives and committee assignment in the UK’s mixed-member legislatures , 2018, Regional & Federal Studies.

[7]  Yiqing Xu,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice , 2016, Political Analysis.

[8]  J. Vowles.  Legislative accountability in a mixed-member system , 2015 .

[9]  Michael F. Stoffel.  MP behavior in mixed-member electoral systems , 2014 .

[10]  Joel W. Johnson.  Campaign Spending in Proportional Electoral Systems , 2013 .

[11]  Robert J. Pekkanen,et al.  Reverse Contamination , 2012 .

[12]  G. R. Stephens,et al.  Parties, organizational capacities and external change: New Zealand’s National and Labour parties, candidate selection and the advent of MMP , 2011 .

[13]  Yann P. Kerevel.  The legislative consequences of Mexico’s mixed-member electoral system, 2000–2009 , 2010 .

[14]  K. Benoit,et al.  Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects in Proportional Electoral Systems , 2010 .

[15]  K. Benoit,et al.  The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending , 2008 .

[16]  T. Gschwend,et al.  Individualised Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Candidates in the 2005 German Elections , 2008 .

[17]  Thomas Brambor,et al.  Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses , 2006, Political Analysis.

[18]  G. Cox.  How Electoral Reform Might Affect the Number of Political Parties in The Netherlands , 2006 .

[19]  David Denemark.  Electoral Change, Inertia and Campaigns in New Zealand , 2003 .

[20]  Erik S. Herron.  Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence from Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada , 2002 .

[21]  S. Banducci,et al.  Strategic Voting, party activity, and candidate effects: Testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand's new mixed system. , 2002 .

[22]  Erik S. Herron,et al.  Contamination effects and the number of parties in mixed-superposition electoral systems , 2001 .

[23]  M. McKean,et al.  Japan's new electoral system: la plus ça change , 2000 .

[24]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Equilibria in Campaign Spending Games: Theory and Data , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[25]  David Denemark.  Campaign Activities and Marginality: The Transition to MMP Campaigns , 1998 .

[26]  David Denemark.  Thinking Ahead to Mixed-Member Proportional Representation , 1996 .

[27]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Argument , 1990 .

[28]  G. Jacobson,et al.  The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections , 1978, American Political Science Review.