A corpus-based interpretation of the discourse–cognitive–society triangle on Chinese court judgments

[1]  D. Machin,et al.  The law and critical discourse studies , 2022, Critical Discourse Studies.

[2]  Le Cheng,et al.  Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis , 2022, Discourse & Communication.

[3]  M. Asghar,et al.  Efficient Prediction of Court Judgments Using an LSTM+CNN Neural Network Model with an Optimal Feature Set , 2022, Mathematics.

[4]  Jingjing Wu,et al.  A sociosemiotic exploration of medical legislation reform in China (1990–2021) , 2021, International Journal of Legal Discourse.

[5]  M. Andersson.  Antiracist discourse. Theory and history of a macromovement , 2021, Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[6]  T. V. Dijk.  Antiracist Discourse , 2021 .

[7]  Le Cheng,et al.  Evidentiality of court judgments in the People’s Republic of China: A semiotic perspective , 2020 .

[8]  Wei Yu.  Reporting Verbs in Court Judgments of the Common Law System: A Corpus-Based Study , 2020 .

[9]  Jingjing Wu,et al.  Study on utterances of administrative law enforcement in van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis , 2019 .

[10]  J. Sheyholislami,,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis , 2019, Research Methods for Classroom Discourse.

[11]  J. Richardson,et al.  The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies , 2018 .

[12]  Le Cheng,et al.  Linguistic variation and legal representation in legislative discourse: A corpus-based multi-dimensional study , 2017 .

[13]  J. Baker,et al.  Corpus-based approaches , 2017 .

[14]  T. V. Dijk.  Socio-cognitive discourse studies , 2017 .

[15]  Lianzhen He,et al.  Revisiting judgment translation in Hong Kong , 2016 .

[16]  Susanne Hertz.  Critical Discourse Analysis And Language Cognition , 2016 .

[17]  T. A. Dijk.  Discourse-Cognition-Society Current State and Prospects of the Socio- Cognitive Approach to Discourse , 2016 .

[18]  Richard Ingold,et al.  Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre Based View , 2015 .

[19]  Richard John Walker,et al.  Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) , 2015 .

[20]  V. Dijk,et al.  3 critical discourse studies : a sociocognitive approach , 2015 .

[21]  Vijay K. Bhatia,et al.  Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings , 2014 .

[22]  T. V. Dijk.  Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach , 2014 .

[23]  Le Cheng,et al.  Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland , 2014 .

[24]  Alan Partington,et al.  Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (Cads) , 2013 .

[25]  Le Cheng,et al.  Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction , 2012 .

[26]  Le Cheng.  Attribution and judicial control in Chinese court judgments: a corpus-based study , 2012 .

[27]  Le Cheng.  Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control , 2011 .

[28]  Le Cheng,et al.  A sociosemiotic interpretation of linguistic modality in legal settings , 2011 .

[29]  C. Hart.  Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse , 2010 .

[30]  C. Hart.  Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science , 2010 .

[31]  Le Cheng,et al.  A semiotic interpretation of genre: Judgments as an example , 2010 .

[32]  Winnie Cheng,et al.  Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams , 2009 .

[33]  T. V. Dijk.  Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk , 2009 .

[34]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach , 2008 .

[35]  R. Sandefur.  Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality , 2008 .

[36]  Paul Rayson,et al.  From key words to key semantic domains , 2008 .

[37]  Le Cheng,et al.  Contrastive analysis of Chinese and American court judgments , 2008 .

[38]  Cheng Le.  Identification and Appraisal of Intergenericity in Judgments , 2007 .

[39]  B. Samraj.  WORLDS OF WRITTEN DISCOURSE: A GENRE-BASED VIEW , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[40]  Anatol Stefanowitsch,et al.  Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy , 2006 .

[41]  Vincent A Sikora,et al.  Language and the law. , 2003, Journal of environmental health.

[42]  John Gibbons,et al.  Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System , 2003 .

[43]  F. D. Haan.  The relation between modality and evidentiality , 2001 .

[44]  Dennis Kurzon,et al.  The politeness of judges: American and English judicial behaviour , 2001 .

[45]  Michael Meyer,et al.  Methods of text and discourse analysis , 2000 .

[46]  P. H. Collin,et al.  Dictionary of Law , 2023 .

[47]  D. Bell,et al.  Re/Writing Skills Training in Law Schools--Legal Literacy Revisited , 1998 .

[48]  Van Dijk T. Ed,et al.  Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction , 1997 .

[49]  Geoff Thompson,et al.  Voices in the Text: Discourse Perspectives on Language Reports , 1996 .

[50]  C. Seron,et al.  LAW AND INEQUALITY: Race, Gender ... and, of Course, Class , 1996 .

[51]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[52]  Lawrence M. Solan,et al.  The Language of Judges , 1993 .

[53]  M. Dascal,et al.  Speaker’s of commitment and involvement in discourse , 1989 .

[54]  Y. Tobin.  From Sign to Text: A semiotic view of communication , 1985 .

[55]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[56]  郭健生.  Style in Fiction:A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose , 1983 .

[57]  G. Leech.  Style in fiction : a linguistic introduction to English fictional prose / Geoffrey Neil Leech , 1981 .

[58]  R. D'amico.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[59]  J. Wetter.  The styles of appellate judicial opinions : a case study in comparative law , 1960 .

[60]  J. Wetter.  The Style of Appelate Judicial Opinions: a Case Study , 1959 .