Investigation of firebrand generation from an experimental fire: Development of a reliable data collection methodology

Abstract An experimental approach has been developed to quantify the characteristics and flux of firebrands during a management-scale wildfire in a pine-dominated ecosystem. By characterizing the local fire behavior and measuring the temporal and spatial variation in firebrand collection, the flux of firebrands has been related to the fire behavior for the first time. This linkage is seen as the first step in risk mitigation at the wildland urban interface (WUI). Data analyses allowed the evaluation of firebrand flux with respect to observed fire intensities for this ecosystem. Typical firebrand fluxes of 0.82–1.36 pcs m −2  s −1 were observed for fire intensities ranging between 7.35±3.48 MW m −1 to 12.59±5.87 MW m −1 . The experimental approach is shown to provide consistent experimental data, with small variations within the firebrand collection area. Particle size distributions show that small particles of area 0.75–5×10 −5  m 2 are the most abundant (0.6–1 pcs m −2  s −1 ), with the total flux of particles >5×10 −5  m 2 equal to 0.2–0.3 pcs m −2  s −1 . The experimental method and the data gathered show substantial promise for future investigation and quantification of firebrand generation and consequently a better description of the firebrand risk at the WUI.

[1]  David R. Weise,et al.  Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires , 2010 .

[2]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[3]  G. Heskestad,et al.  A robust bidirectional low-velocity probe for flame and fire application , 1976 .

[4]  M. E. Alexander,et al.  Interdependencies between flame length and fireline intensity in predicting crown fire initiation and crown scorch height , 2012 .

[5]  R. Kremens,et al.  An experimental approach to the evaluation of prescribed fire behavior , 2014 .

[6]  R. Kremens,et al.  Investigation of firebrand production during prescribed fires conducted in a pine forest , 2017 .

[7]  Andrew L. Sullivan,et al.  A review of radiant heat flux models used in bushfire applications , 2003 .

[8]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[9]  William Mell,et al.  Framework for Addressing the National Wildland Urban Interface Fire Problem - Determining Fire and Ember Exposure Zones Using a WUI Hazard Scale , 2012 .

[10]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  On the development and characterization of a firebrand generator , 2008 .

[11]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Characterizing Firebrand Exposure from Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) Fires: Results from the 2007 Angora Fire , 2014 .

[12]  Carlos Sánchez Tarifa,et al.  On the flight pahts and lifetimes of burning particles of wood , 1965 .

[13]  Michael J. Gollner,et al.  A Review of Pathways for Building Fire Spread in the Wildland Urban Interface Part II: Response of Components and Systems and Mitigation Strategies in the United States , 2017 .

[14]  Pf Ellis The aerodynamic and combustion characteristics of eucalypt bark : a firebrand study , 2000 .

[15]  Mohamad El Houssami,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURAL WOOD IGNITION BY FIREBRAND ACCUMULATION , 2015 .

[16]  Albert Simeoni,et al.  Experimental Procedures Characterising Firebrand Generation in Wildland Fires , 2016 .

[17]  Daniel J. Gorham,et al.  Review of Pathways for Building Fire Spread in the Wildland Urban Interface Part I: Exposure Conditions , 2017 .

[18]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Enabling the study of structure vulnerabilities to ignition from wind driven firebrand showers: A summary of experimental results , 2012 .

[19]  N. Skowronski,et al.  Assessment of Canopy Fuel Loading Across a Heterogeneous Landscape Using LiDAR , 2010 .

[20]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands , 2005 .