Nanoeducation: Zooming into Teacher Professional Development Programmes in Nanoscience and Technology

In this chapter, we present four different professional development programmes for in- and pre-service teachers and the accompanying research in the area of nanoscience and technology. First, we will present a review of the literature to lay out the field of conditions and approaches introducing nanoscience and nanotechnology into programmes for in- and pre-service teachers. This introduction will be followed by the four projects. The first study explores the goals and preconditions of introducing nanoscience into pre-service teacher education programmes; the second reports experiences from a programme for pre-service teachers. The third programme offers teachers authentic insights into research facilities. The fourth project reports about the design of an in-service teacher training programme focusing specifically on the use of models to teach and learn important nano techniques, such as atomic force microscopy. Those exemplary projects have been accompanied by different qualitative and quantitative research approaches which will also be outlined. The results of all four programmes clearly show the need for further investigations and course developments, based on the pre- and in-service teachers’ needs. They also give hints on successful tools and structures that could be used in other programmes on nanoscience, in modern scientific areas of interest for education as well.

[1]  R. Blonder The Story of Nanomaterials in Modern Technology: An Advanced Course for Chemistry Teachers , 2011 .

[2]  Greg Light,et al.  An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Transferability of a Nanoscience Module , 2009 .

[3]  Ilka Parchmann,et al.  The Model of Educational Reconstruction A Framework for improving teaching and learning science , 2012 .

[4]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  From Vision to the Implementation of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative , 2001 .

[5]  T. Husén,et al.  The International Encyclopedia of Education , 1994 .

[6]  Aaron Kim,et al.  NanoCORE at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering: Program Overview and a Unique Assessment Approach , 2011 .

[7]  Miriam Ossevoort,et al.  Promoting successful science education - the worth of science education research , 2008 .

[8]  Carolyn A. Nichol,et al.  Professional Development for Teachers in Nanotechnology Using Distance Learning Technologies , 2010 .

[9]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[10]  M. Roco National Nanotechnology Initiative , 2012 .

[11]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Model Use Choices of Secondary Teachers in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education , 2010 .

[12]  Song Jin,et al.  Design and Initial Evaluation of an Online Nanoscience Course for Teachers , 2009 .

[13]  J. Falk,et al.  Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning , 2000 .

[14]  Thomas R. Tretter,et al.  Teachers’ Concepts of Spatial Scale: An international comparison , 2013 .

[15]  Ron Blonder The Influence of a Teaching Model in Nanotechnology on Chemistry Teachers' Knowledge and Their Teaching Attitudes , 2010 .

[16]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[17]  Ilka Parchmann,et al.  „Kann man Atome sehen?“ – Eine Reflexion aus Sicht verschiedener Wissenschaften. “Can You See Atoms?” – A Reflection from Different Scientific Perspectives , 2010 .

[18]  Mihail C Roco,et al.  Converging science and technology at the nanoscale: opportunities for education and training , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[20]  V. Albe,et al.  Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: a review of literature , 2010 .