Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: Implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

OBJECTIVE To determine the strength of common radiographic and radial CT views for measuring true femoral head asphericity. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 15 patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and 15 controls, alpha angles were measured by two observers using radial CT (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°) and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) for the: anterior-posterior (AP), standing frog-leg lateral, 45° Dunn with neutral rotation, 45° Dunn with 40° external rotation, and cross-table lateral views. A DRR validation study was performed. Alpha angles were compared between groups. Maximum deviation from a sphere of each subject was obtained from a previous study. Alpha angles from each view were correlated with maximum deviation. RESULTS There were no significant differences between alpha angles measured on radiographs and the corresponding DRRs (p=0.72). Alpha angles were significantly greater in patients for all views (p≤0.002). Alpha angles from the 45° Dunn with 40° external rotation, cross-table lateral, and 60° radial views had the strongest correlations with maximum deviation (r=0.831; r=0.823; r=0.808, respectively). The AP view had the weakest correlation (r=0.358). CONCLUSION DRRs were a validated means to simulate hip radiographs. The 45° Dunn with 40° external rotation, cross-table lateral, and 60° radial views best visualized femoral asphericity. Although commonly used, the AP view did not visualize cam deformities well. Overall, the magnitude of the alpha angle may not be indicative of the size of the deformity. Thus, 3D reconstructions and measurements of asphericity could improve the diagnosis of cam FAI.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[4]  S. Bixby,et al.  Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[5]  G. Camanho,et al.  Femoral Head-neck Junction Deformity is Related to Osteoarthritis of the Hip , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  J. Weiss,et al.  ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Biomechanics 43 (2010) 1351–1357 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect , 2022 .

[8]  R. J. Otto,et al.  The Frog-leg Lateral Radiograph Accurately Visualized Hip Cam Impingement Abnormalities , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. , 2006, Radiology.

[10]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Comparison of MRI Alpha Angle Measurement Planes in Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Karen Steger-May,et al.  Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters of adult hip structural anatomy. , 2011, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[12]  J. Clohisy,et al.  Do Plain Radiographs Correlate With CT for Imaging of Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Reto Sutter,et al.  How useful is the alpha angle for discriminating between symptomatic patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement and asymptomatic volunteers? , 2012, Radiology.

[14]  R. Ganz,et al.  Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  M. Tannast,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Can the Alpha Angle Assessment of Cam Impingement Predict Acetabular Cartilage Delamination? , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  M. Beck,et al.  Do Normal Radiographs Exclude Asphericity of the Femoral Head-Neck Junction? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  Marc J Philippon,et al.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  J. Parvizi,et al.  The prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular deformity in asymptomatic adults. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Validity of the Alpha Angle Measurement on Plain Radiographs in the Evaluation of Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  Andrew E. Anderson,et al.  Three-dimensional Quantification of Femoral Head Shape in Controls and Patients with Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Tony D Goh,et al.  Computed Tomography Assessment of Hip Joints in Asymptomatic Individuals in Relation to Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  E. Zaragoza,et al.  Three‐dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  R. Ganz,et al.  Comparison of Six Radiographic Projections to Assess Femoral Head/Neck Asphericity , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  M. Leunig,et al.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  R. Ganz,et al.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  W. Hayes,et al.  Cross-sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae--a biomechanical investigation: I. Method and general patterns of variation. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  R. Ganz,et al.  Abnormal Extension of the Femoral Head Epiphysis as a Cause of Cam Impingement , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  S. Konan,et al.  Is the frog lateral plain radiograph a reliable predictor of the alpha angle in femoroacetabular impingement? , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  R. Ganz,et al.  Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Screening of Anterior Femoral Head-Neck Offset in Patients with Femoro-Acetabular Impingement , 2001 .

[33]  Michael M. Folkerts.  Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs , 2015, HiPC 2015.