Shelf-margin architecture and shoreline processes at the shelf-edge: Controls on sediment partitioning and prediction of deep-water deposition style

The Lower Barrow Group (LBG; Latest Tithonian - Early Valanginian) is a shelf-margin that prograded during a late phase of rifting under various subsidence regimes and supply-dominated conditions. A 3D semi-automatic, full-volume seismic interpretation method allow identifying high-order clinothems presenting an estimated cyclicity of -40,000 yrs, in which a quantitative analysis of the shelf-margin architecture and shorelines processes was conducted. Overall, three and four main types of hydrodynamic regimes and deep-water systems were identified, respectively. Falling to flat shelf-edge trajectories are associated with sediment bypass, whereas rising shelf-edge trajectories are linked with increasing sediment storage on the shelf. While fluvial to wave processes can be dominant in all A/S conditions, results show that fluvial-dominated coastlines are associated with steep high-angle slope clinoforms and short to longer run-out turbidites. Conversely, wave-dominated coastlines are linked to low-angle slope clinoforms and poor turbidite system development (occasional sheet sand and MTDs). The short and longer run-out turbidite systems present a tripartite architecture (canyon / slope valley; channel; lobes) which mostly appear as short-lived, vertically / laterally stacked elements fed my multiple small rivers forming linear ramp systems. Due to the shallow configuration of the margin (<500m), the presence of short slopes and overall high sand-to-mud ratio, the turbidite systems are smaller scale (<50 km) and probably shorter lived than most modern turbidite systems (100-1000 km). This study sheds new lights on the significant role of shelf-margin architecture (slope gradient, hydrodynamic regime) in predicting the deep-water sediment delivery behavior (sediment partitioning, type of deep-water system).

[1]  H. Posamentier,et al.  Controls on shelf-margin architecture and sediment partitioning during a syn-rift to post-rift transition: Insights from the Barrow Group (Northern Carnarvon Basin, North West Shelf, Australia) , 2017 .

[2]  Z. Sylvester,et al.  Sediment partitioning, continental slopes and base‐of‐slope systems , 2017 .

[3]  I. Lunt,et al.  Deciphering Earth's Natural Hourglasses: Perspectives On Source-To-Sink Analysis , 2016 .

[4]  R. Bell,et al.  The stratigraphic record of prebreakup geodynamics: Evidence from the Barrow Delta, offshore Northwest Australia , 2016 .

[5]  Yingmin Wang,et al.  Grain size and transport regime at shelf edge as fundamental controls on delivery of shelf-edge sands to deepwater , 2016 .

[6]  Yingmin Wang,et al.  Shelf-margin architecture variability and its role in sediment-budget partitioning into deep-water areas , 2016 .

[7]  R. Steel,et al.  Shelf-Edge Delta Regime As A Predictor of Deep-Water Deposition , 2012 .

[8]  R. Nanson,et al.  Dynamic spatial and temporal prediction of changes in depositional processes on clastic shorelines: Toward improved subsurface uncertainty reduction and management , 2011 .

[9]  R. Steel,et al.  Sediment supply: The main driver of shelf-margin growth , 2009 .

[10]  G. Hampson,et al.  Trajectory analysis: concepts and applications , 2009 .

[11]  G. Hampson,et al.  Shelf edge and shoreline trajectories, a dynamic approach to stratigraphic analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Henry W. Posamentier,et al.  Eustatic Controls on Clastic Deposition I—conceptual Framework , 1988 .