Building energy-efficiency standards in a life cycle primary energy perspective

In this study we analyze the life cycle primary energy use of a wood-frame apartment building designed to meet the current Swedish building code, the Swedish building code of 1994 or the passive house standard, and heated with district heat or electric resistance heating. The analysis includes the primary energy use during the production, operation and end-of-life phases. We find that an electric heated building built to the current building code has greater life cycle primary energy use relative to a district heated building, although the standard for electric heating is more stringent. Also, the primary energy use for an electric heated building constructed to meet the passive house standard is substantially higher than for a district heated building built to the Swedish building code of 1994. The primary energy for material production constitutes 5% of the primary energy for production and space heating and ventilation of an electric heated building built to meet the 1994 code. The share of production energy increases as the energy-efficiency standard of the building improves and when efficient energy supply is used, and reaches 30% for a district heated passive house. This study shows the significance of a life cycle primary energy perspective and the choice of heating system in reducing energy use in the built environment.

[1]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Building regulation and sustainable housing. Part 1: a critique of Part L of the Building Regulations 1995 for England and Wales , 2000 .

[2]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. , 2009 .

[3]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Life cycle optimization of extremely low energy buildings , 2007 .

[4]  Karin Adalberth,et al.  Energy Use and Environmental Impact of New Residential Buildings , 2000 .

[5]  Viktor Dorer,et al.  Re-inventing air heating: Convenient and comfortable within the frame of the Passive House concept , 2005 .

[6]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  LCA of building frame structures : environmetal impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames , 1997 .

[7]  Other.  Buildings and Climate Change: Status, Challenges and opportunities , 2007 .

[8]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Primary energy implications of end-use energy efficiency measures in district heated buildings , 2011 .

[9]  Juha Heikkinen,et al.  Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests , 2003 .

[10]  Roger Sathre,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy and Carbon Implications of Wood-Based Products and Construction , 2007 .

[11]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 Mitigation: On Methods and Parameters for Comparison of Fossil-Fuel and Biofuel Systems , 2006 .

[12]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[13]  W. Nordhaus.  The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[14]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  Energy-efficient houses built according to the energy performance requirements introduced in Denmark in 2006 , 2007 .

[15]  Xavier García Casals,et al.  Analysis of building energy regulation and certification in Europe: Their role, limitations and differences , 2006 .

[16]  Francesco Asdrubali,et al.  Comparative study of energy regulations for buildings in Italy and Spain , 2008 .

[17]  Svein Ruud,et al.  A Classification of Passive House for Swedish Conditions , 2007 .

[18]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Energy implications of end-of-life options for building materials , 2008 .

[19]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[20]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[21]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Life-cycle energy use in office buildings , 1996 .

[22]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[23]  S. Citherlet,et al.  Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span , 2007 .

[24]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Multi-storey timber buildings: breaking industry path dependency , 2008 .

[25]  Milou Beerepoot,et al.  Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector , 2007 .

[26]  Tarja Häkkinen,et al.  Environmental data for production of reinforcement bars from scrap iron and for production of steel products from iron ore in the Nordic countries , 2001 .

[27]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Energy conservation regulations: Impacts on design and procurement of low energy buildings , 2009 .

[28]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems , 1998 .

[29]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life‐Cycle Energy, Costs, and Strategies for Improving a Single‐Family House , 2000 .

[30]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change , 2009 .

[31]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings , 2006 .

[32]  Andreas H. Hermelink,et al.  CEPHEUS results : measurements and occupants' satisfaction provide evidence for Passive Houses being an option for sustainable building , 2006 .

[33]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  New gross energy-requirement figures for materials production , 1994 .

[34]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .