Associations between Classroom Conditions and Teacher's Voice Production☆

Abstract In this study, associations between classroom conditions and teachers’ voce use were researched (N=40). Acoustic variables were reverberation time (T 60 ), early decay time (EDT), sound strength (G), the ratio of early and late sound energy arriving to a listener (C 50 ), the ratio of early arriving sound energy to overall sound energy (D 50 ), speech transmission index (STI) and rate of spatial decay of sound pressure levels (DL 2 ). Indoor climate was also evaluated. Voice variables measured were sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency (F 0 ) and spectrum slope. According to findings when the values of T 60 , EDT and DL 2 were lower or the values of C50, D50 and G higher, teachers’ voice SPL was higher. When reverberation times were longer, F 0 increased and when the values of C 50 and D 50 were higher, men's F 0 was higher. Poor indoor air increased occurrence of laryngitis. The results showed that indoor environment affects voice use and thus, is associated with the health of voice organs.

[1]  P. Alku,et al.  Pilot study on acute voice and throat symptoms related to exposure to organic dust: Preliminary findings from a provocation test , 2009, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.

[2]  P. Dejonckere,et al.  Laryngeal mucosa elasticity and viscosity in high and low relative air humidity , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[3]  Alex Burdorf,et al.  Effects of noise and acoustics in schools on vocal health in teachers , 2015, Noise & health.

[4]  Roger Persson,et al.  A study of classroom acoustics and school teachers’ noise exposure, voice load and speaking time during teaching, and the effects on vocal and mental fatigue development , 2014, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

[5]  E. van Heusden,et al.  Effect of ambient noise on the vocal output and the preferred listening level of conversational speech , 1979 .

[6]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Long-term vocal parameters of primary school teachers and classroom acoustics with and without an acoustical treatment , 2014 .

[7]  I. Annesi-Maesano,et al.  School air quality related to dry cough, rhinitis and nasal patency in children , 2010, European Respiratory Journal.

[8]  T. Meklin,et al.  Effects of mould remediation on school teachers' health , 2004, International journal of environmental health research.

[9]  D. Dubois,et al.  Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Effects of Surface Dehydration on Mucosal Wave Amplitude and Frequency in Excised Canine Larynges , 2011, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  R. Patel,et al.  The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: laboratory research. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L. Rantala,et al.  Connections between voice ergonomic risk factors and voice symptoms, voice handicap, and respiratory tract diseases. , 2012, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[14]  Magnus Haake,et al.  Does the speaker's voice quality influence children's performance on a language comprehension test? , 2015, International journal of speech-language pathology.

[15]  B. Brunekreef,et al.  Exposure to indoor mould and children’s respiratory health in the PATY study , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[16]  Maria Södersten,et al.  Loud voice during environmental noise exposure in patients with vocal nodules , 2007, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.