Effects and repercussions of local/hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review

BackgroundHealth technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly performed at the local or hospital level where the costs, impacts, and benefits of health technologies can be directly assessed. Although local/hospital-based HTA has been implemented for more than two decades in some jurisdictions, little is known about its effects and impact on hospital budget, clinical practices, and patient outcomes. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review that aimed to synthesize current evidence regarding the effects and impact of local/hospital-based HTA.MethodsWe identified articles through PubMed and Embase and by citation tracking of included studies. We selected qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods studies with empirical data about the effects or impact of local/hospital-based HTA on decision-making, budget, or perceptions of stakeholders. We extracted the following information from included studies: country, methodological approach, and use of conceptual framework; local/hospital HTA approach and activities described; reported effects and impacts of local/hospital-based HTA; factors facilitating/hampering the use of hospital-based HTA recommendations; and perceptions of stakeholders concerning local/hospital HTA. Due to the great heterogeneity among studies, we conducted a narrative synthesis of their results.ResultsA total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. We reported the results according to the four approaches for performing HTA proposed by the Hospital Based HTA Interest Sub-Group: ambassador model, mini-HTA, internal committee, and HTA unit. Results showed that each of these approaches for performing HTA corresponds to specific needs and structures and has its strengths and limitations. Overall, studies showed positive impacts related to local/hospital-based HTA on hospital decisions and budgets, as well as positive perceptions from managers and clinicians.ConclusionsLocal/hospital-based HTA could influence decision-making on several aspects. It is difficult to evaluate the real impacts of local HTA at the different levels of health care given the relatively small number of evaluations with quantitative data and the lack of clear comparators. Further research is necessary to explore the conditions under which local/hospital-based HTA results and recommendations can impact hospital policies, clinical decisions, and quality of care and optimize the use of scarce resources.

[1]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[2]  Ruth E. Brown,et al.  The Use of Technology Assessment by Hospitals, Health Maintenance Organizations, and Third-Party Payers in the United States , 1995, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[3]  C. Umscheid,et al.  Integrating local data into hospital-based healthcare technology assessment: Two case studies , 2010, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  Joseph S Pliskin,et al.  Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: Insights from Israeli medical centers , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[5]  Akers,et al.  Systematic Reviews [ressource électronique]. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2009 .

[6]  E. Tacconelli Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[7]  S. Weingart,et al.  Deciding to Buy Expensive Technology: The Case of Biliary Lithotripsy , 1995, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  Maurice McGregor,et al.  End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  I. Zechmeister,et al.  ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON THE AUSTRIAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[10]  Poul Holt Pedersen,et al.  [Attitudes to the use of a decision support method when introducing new medical technology at the University Hospital of Copenhagen]. , 2006, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[11]  I. Zechmeister,et al.  THE IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS ON DECISION MAKING IN AUSTRIA , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  J. Pliskin,et al.  DECISION MAKING IN ACQUIRING MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN ISRAELI MEDICAL CENTERS , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[13]  Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al.  Doing mini–health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[14]  The Alberta Ambassador Program: delivering Health Technology Assessment results to rural practitioners , 2006, BMC medical education.

[15]  I. England,et al.  The Impact of Health Technology Assessment on Decision-Making Processes in Public Versus Not-for-Profit Private Hospitals , 2011 .

[16]  P. Prognon,et al.  HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES IN UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS AND THE ROLE OF HOSPITAL PHARMACISTS: LEARNING FROM INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE , 2013, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  A Granados Health technology assessment and clinical decision making: which is the best evidence? , 1999, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[18]  M. Mcgregor,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Health Technology Assessment , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  Robert C. Lee,et al.  HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, RESEARCH, AND IMPLEMENTATION WITHIN A HEALTH REGION IN ALBERTA, CANADA , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[20]  M. Ouimet,et al.  OppOrtunities tO prOmOte efficiency in HOspital DecisiOn-making tHrOugH tHe use Of HealtH tecHnOlOgy assessment cHsrf series Of repOrts On cOst Drivers anD HealtH system efficiency : paper 7 , 2011 .

[21]  C. Umscheid,et al.  Hospital-Based Comparative Effectiveness Centers: Translating Research into Practice to Improve the Quality, Safety and Value of Patient Care , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  A. Greer Adoption of Medical Technology: The Hospital's Three Decision Systems , 1985, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[23]  D Menon,et al.  Technology assessment in teaching hospitals. , 1990, Dimensions in health service.

[24]  E. Jonsson,et al.  History of health technology assessment in Sweden , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[25]  É. Féry-Lemonnier,et al.  Impact of CEDIT recommendations: An example of health technology assessment in a hospital network , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.