Differentiation of Nerve Terminals in the Crayfish Opener Muscle and Its Functional Significance

Junctional potentials (jp's) recorded from superficial distal fibers of the crayfish opener muscle are up to 50 times larger than jp' in superficial central fibers when the single motor axon that innervates the muscle is stimulated at a frequency of 1/sec or less. At 80/sec, in contrast, central jp's are up to four times larger than those observed in distal fibers. The tension produced by single muscle fibers of either type is directly proportional to the integral of the time-voltage curve minus an excitation-contraction coupling threshold of 3 mv. Distal fibers therefore produce almost all the total muscle tension at low frequencies of stimulation and central fibers add an increasingly greater contribution as their nerve endings begin to facilitate in response to increased rate of motor discharge. Differentiation of muscle membrane characteristics (input resistance, space constant, time constant) cannot account for these differences in facilitation ratios. The mechanism of neuronal differentiation is not based upon the size or effectiveness of transmitter quanta, since equal sized jp's have equal variances;: mjp sizes and variances are also equal. No differences were found between fiber types in rates of transmitter mobilization, density of innervation, or the relationship between transmitter release and terminal depolarization. Single terminals on distal fibers were found to release transmitter with a greater probability than central terminals. More effective invasion of distal terminals by the nerve impulse at low frequencies can account for the difference.

[1]  H. Atwood,et al.  TENSION DEVELOPMENT AND MEMBRANE RESPONSES IN PHASIC AND TONIC MUSCLE FIBERS OF A CRAB. , 1964, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[2]  H. Atwood Variation in Physiological Properties of Crustacean Motor Synapses , 1967, Nature.

[3]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Reflex Control of Abdominal Flexor Muscles in the Crayfish , 1965 .

[4]  R. Orkand,et al.  The relation between membrane potential and contraction in single crayfish muscle fibres , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  Presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B. Katz,et al.  The electrical properties of crustacean muscle fibres , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  P. Gage,et al.  Dual Effect of Potassium on Transmitter Release , 1965, Nature.

[8]  H. Atwood Crustacean Neuromuscular Mechanisms , 1967 .

[9]  Wiersma Ca,et al.  Membrane potential changes on activation in crustacean muscle fibers. , 1961 .

[10]  P. Fatt,et al.  Membrane permeability change during inhibitory transmitter action in crustacean muscle , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  B. Katz,et al.  Quantal components of the end‐plate potential , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  B. Katz,et al.  On the factors which determine the amplitude of the ‘miniature end‐plate potential’ , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  Mechanism of facilitation at the crayfish neuromuscular junction , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  H. Gainer,et al.  Membrane Conductance during Depolarizing Postsynaptic Potentials of Crayfish Muscle Fibres , 1962, Nature.

[15]  G. Hoyle,et al.  Inhibition at neuromuscular junctions in Crustacea , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  H. Barlow,et al.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  H. Atwood Excitation and inhibition in crab muscle fibres. , 1965, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.

[18]  P. Fatt,et al.  Distributed ‘End-Plate Potentials’ of Crustacean Muscle Fibres , 1953 .

[19]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  The quantal nature of transmission and spontaneous miniature potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  G. Hoyle,et al.  Coupling of membrane potential to contraction in crustacean muscles , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. W. Liley,et al.  The effects of presynaptic polarization on the spontaneous activity at the mammalian neuromuscular junction , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  G. Hoyle,et al.  Mechanical and electrical responses of single innervated crab‐muscle fibres. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  A. Harreveld,et al.  A Physiological Solution for Freshwater Crustaceans , 1936 .

[24]  G. Hoyle,et al.  A further study of the paradox phenomenon of crustacean muscle. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.