Modularization - Enabler for Shop Floor Involvement in Improvement and Development

The introduction of modules and product platforms implies a strategy where the scope should encompass not a single product, but a family or an assortment of products. Instead of searching for "an optimal design for an optimal product", the objective should be to create a flexible product design, allowing product variations without requiring changes in the overall product design every time a new variant is introduced. This flexibility in product design and customization has been regarded as a feasible way for leisure boat manufacturers in high-cost countries like Norway to be competitive in the increasingly tougher conditions of the leisure boat market. The incremental development process that we often find in e.g. craft manufacturing, which leisure boat manufacturing can be seen as, is well suited for modularization. A way to introduce a module-based product architecture could be to identify key parts of the products – parts, systems or components that enable the development of modules. This paper describes how modularization makes it easier to address improvement and development in the company. This paper also reports how the focus modularization enabled profound involvements from employees that reduced barriers to change. This, over time, also challenged the traditional “craftsmen culture” into a more change-oriented and proactive culture at shop floor level.

[1]  Daniel Roos,et al.  The machine that changed the world : the story of lean production , 1991 .

[2]  Rebecca Duray Mass customizers' use of inventory, planning techniques and channel management , 2004 .

[3]  A. Rosenblatt,et al.  Who's ahead in hi-tech? , 1991, IEEE Spectrum.

[4]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Product Leadership: Creating And Launching Superior New Products , 1998 .

[5]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  The historical roots of concurrent engineering fundamentals , 1997 .

[6]  Asbjørn Rolstadås,et al.  Knowledge and manufacturing strategy–how different manufacturing paradigms have different requirements to knowledge. Examples from the automotive industry , 2010 .

[7]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[8]  Gunnar Erixon,et al.  Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms , 1999 .

[9]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  Principles of concurrent engineering , 1993 .

[10]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[11]  T. Hill Operations management : strategic context and managerial analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  Concurrent engineering : contemporary issues and modern design tools , 1993 .

[13]  Bernadette Dilger,et al.  Identification of future skills needs in micro and craft (-type) enterprises up to 2020 , 2011 .

[14]  F. Jovane,et al.  Present and future of flexible automation: Towards new paradigms , 2003 .

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Modularity-In-Design: An Analysis Based On the Theory Of Real Options , 1998 .

[16]  Asbjørn Rolstadås,et al.  Manufacturing Outsourcing: A Knowledge Perspective , 2012 .