Global benefits, local burdens? The paradox of governing biofuels production in Kansas and Iowa

Abstract Recent sociological analysis of the expansion of the biofuels industry internationally has noted the paradox between the purported global environmental benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by replacing fossil fuels with biofuels, and the potential for distinctly negative environmental impacts experienced at local sites of biofuels production. The state, in both the USA and the EU, has played a prominent role in promoting the development and expansion of biofuels production through government mandates and incentives, but the state's role in governing the potentially (negative) economic, social or environmental impacts of biofuels production on local communities has been much more limited in scope. We review the environmental sociological literature to frame analysis of how the state is governing the benefits and burdens brought by the ethanol industry to rural communities in Kansas and Iowa. Drawing on data from community surveys, focus group and individual interviews and analysis of environmental violations, the paper examines the local impacts of biofuels production in three case-study communities. Findings suggest that local residents do not express many concerns about environmental impacts and that the state has played a modest role in governing the negative local environmental impacts. We argue that this lack of concern is related to the histories of these rural communities, which have long depended on resource extractive industries and currently are desperate for economic growth. We find that criticisms of negative environmental impacts are muted in relation to purported economic benefits and to other comparable industries. These community case studies illustrate some of the challenges, both at the practical and theoretical levels, of governing biofuels production.

[1]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology , 1994 .

[2]  M. Broadway,et al.  Meat Processing and Garden City, KS: Boom and Bust. , 2006 .

[3]  Kenneth M. Johnson,et al.  Agricultural Dependence and Changing Population in the Great Plains , 2006 .

[4]  Allan Schnaiberg,et al.  The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity , 1980 .

[5]  P. Chisnall Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[6]  Arthur P.J. Mol,et al.  Bringing the environmental state back in: partnerships in perspective , 2006 .

[7]  David L. Brown,et al.  Population change and rural society , 2006 .

[8]  R. Rathge,et al.  Population Change in the Great Plains , 2022 .

[9]  S. Bloom Postville: A Clash of Cultures in Heartland America , 2000 .

[10]  S. Zarrilli Making Certification Work for Sustainable Development: The Case of Biofuels , 2009 .

[11]  A. Mol Environmental authorities and biofuel controversies , 2010 .

[12]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[13]  Arthur P.J. Mol,et al.  From Additions and Withdrawals to Environmental Flows , 2005 .

[14]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[15]  E. Rosa,et al.  Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory , 2003 .

[16]  A. Mol,et al.  Partnerships, governance and sustainable development. Reflections on theory and practice , 2007 .

[17]  I. Grant :Governing Environmental Flows: Global Challenges to Social Theory , 2009 .

[18]  Stephen G. Bunker,et al.  How Ecologically Uneven Developments Put the Spin on the Treadmill of Production , 2005 .

[19]  D. Sonnenfeld,et al.  Environmental Reform in Asia , 2006 .

[20]  Arthur P.J. Mol,et al.  Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review , 2000 .

[21]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error , 2009, Science.

[22]  M. Carolan Ecological Modernization Theory:What About Consumption? , 2004 .

[23]  Richard Goe,et al.  Biofuels Bonanza?: Exploring community perceptions of the promises and perils of biofuels production , 2011 .

[24]  R. Dunlap,et al.  A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology , 1980 .

[25]  Frank Biermann,et al.  Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[26]  Arthur P.J. Mol,et al.  Boundless biofuels? Between environmental sustainability and vulnerability. , 2007 .

[27]  D. Fink Cutting into the meatpacking line: workers and change in the rural midwest. , 1998 .

[28]  Adam S. Weinberg,et al.  The treadmill of production and the environmental state , 2002 .

[29]  K. Cassman,et al.  Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn‐Ethanol , 2009 .

[30]  Frederick H. Buttel,et al.  Ecological Modernization as Social Theory , 2000, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.