Sensory Integration Theory: An Alternative to the Approximate Number System

The proficiency and neural underpinnings of human and nonhuman animal ability to estimate or compare different sets of items has been investigated in different fields of research such as evolution, development, and education. The general consensus holds that these abilities are supported by the so-called approximate number system (ANS). In this chapter, we will question the methods used in the ANS studies, challenge the existence of the ANS to some degree, and present an alternative sensory integration theory. First, it is explained how our performance in numerosity judgment tasks can be explained on the basis of a mechanism weighing or integrating the different visual cues. A parallel is drawn between this integration mechanism and conservation abilities. Second, it is discussed how such a integration mechanism can be used to explain the observed relation between performance in numerosity judgment tasks and math achievement.

[1]  David C. Burr,et al.  Separate Mechanisms for Perception of Numerosity and Density , 2014, Psychological science.

[2]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  W. Gevers,et al.  Topographic representation of high-level cognition: numerosity or sensory processing? , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Measuring the Approximate Number System , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Amy Devine,et al.  Visual stimulus parameters seriously compromise the measurement of approximate number system acuity and comparative effects between adults and children , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[7]  T. Tuulmets,et al.  Occupancy model of perceived numerosity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  H. Peak.  The time order error in successive judgments and in reflexes: II. As a function of the first stimulus of a pair. , 1940 .

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Computer-Assisted Intervention for Children with Low Numeracy Skills , 2009 .

[10]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Tests Built from Piaget's and Gesell's Tasks as Predictors of First-Grade Achievement. , 1972 .

[12]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[15]  Nicolas Delcroix,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children: a neo-Piagetian approach. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  Roi Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Intentional and automatic numerical processing as predictors of mathematical abilities in primary school children , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Emergence of a 'visual number sense' in hierarchical generative models , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Continuous visual properties explain neural responses to nonsymbolic number. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Relationships between magnitude representation, counting and memory in 4- to 7-year-old children: A developmental study , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[20]  Vincent Walsh.  A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  S. Dehaene,et al.  An open trial assessment of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[22]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Principles underlying the design of "The Number Race", an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia , 2006, Behavioral and brain functions : BBF.

[24]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  C. Frith,et al.  The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity , 1972 .

[26]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency , 2013, Psychological science.

[27]  S. Dehaene.  Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[28]  V. Csépe,et al.  The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[29]  E. J. Carter,et al.  Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children , 2006, PLoS biology.

[30]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Task- and age-dependent effects of visual stimulus properties on children's explicit numerosity judgments. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Piaget.  The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[33]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Role of Visual Information in Numerosity Estimation , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  James Hiebert,et al.  Piagetian tasks as readiness measures in mathematics instruction: A critical review , 1982 .

[36]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic quantity processing in 5-year olds and adults , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[38]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Cognitive Development and Children's Solutions to Verbal Arithmetic Problems. , 1982 .

[39]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[41]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. , 2012, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[42]  Norman Ginsburg.  Numerosity Estimation as a Function of Stimulus Organization , 1991, Perception.

[43]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[44]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[45]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  False Approximations of the Approximate Number System? , 2011, PloS one.

[47]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Is Approximate Number Precision a Stable Predictor of Math Ability? , 2013, Learning and individual differences.

[48]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: An ERP study , 2008, Brain Research.

[49]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  David C. Burr,et al.  A generalized sense of number , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[52]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Thalia Taloumis.  Scores on Piagetian Area Tasks as Predictors of Achievement in Mathematics over a Four-Year Period. , 1979 .

[54]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[55]  Induced versus Spontaneous Attainment of Concrete Operations and Their Relationship to School Achievement. , 1975 .

[56]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[57]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  Measuring Spatial Factors in Comparative Judgments About Large Numerosities , 2007, HCI.

[58]  Stella F. Lourenco.  On the Relation between Numerical and Non-Numerical Magnitudes: Evidence for a General Magnitude System , 2015 .

[59]  L. Dimitrovsky,et al.  Early Conservation as a Predictor of Arithmetic Achievement. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[60]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Calibrating the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[61]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[62]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  The development of automatic numerosity processing in preschoolers: evidence for numerosity-perceptual interference. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[63]  D. Riccio,et al.  Changes in Memory for Stimulus Attributes: Implications for Tests of Morphine Tolerance , 1990 .

[64]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Automatic comparisons of artificial digits never compared: learning linear ordering relations. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  P. Dodwell.  Children's understanding of number concepts: Characteristics of an individual and of a group test. , 1961 .

[66]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[69]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[70]  O. Houdé.  Abstract after all? Abstraction through inhibition in children and adults , 2009 .

[71]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  How do people apprehend large numerosities? , 2008, Cognition.

[72]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to numerosity is not a unique visuospatial psychophysical predictor of mathematical ability , 2013, Vision Research.

[73]  Stefan Ufer,et al.  How Training on Exact or Approximate Mental Representations of Number Can Enhance First-Grade Students' Basic Number Processing and Arithmetic Skills , 2013 .

[74]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived Numerosity as a Function of Item Size , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[75]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Beyond the number domain , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.