Patterns of Revision in Online Writing

This study examines the revision histories of 10 Wikipedia articles nominated for the site's Featured Article Class (FAC), its highest quality rating, 5 of which achieved FAC and 5 of which did not. The revisions to each article were coded, and the coding results were combined with a descriptive analysis of two representative articles in order to determine revision patterns. All articles in both groups showed a higher percentage of additions of new material compared to deletions and revisions that rearranged the text. Although the FAC articles had roughly equal numbers of content and surface revisions, the non-FAC articles had fewer surface revisions and were dominated by content revisions. Although the unique features of the Wikipedia environment inhibit strict comparisons between these results and those of earlier revision studies, these results suggest revision in this environment places unique structural demands on writers, possibly leading to unique revision patterns.

[1]  The Encyclopædia Britannica , 1902, Nature.

[2]  N. Sommers.  Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[3]  J. Hayes,et al.  The Cognition of Discovery: Defining a Rhetorical Problem. , 1980 .

[4]  Stephen P. Witte,et al.  Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study. , 1983 .

[5]  Sarah Warshauer Freedman,et al.  The Acquisition of Written Language: Response and Revision. Writing Research: Multidisciplinary Inquiries into the Nature of Writing Series. , 1985 .

[6]  L. Flower.  Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[7]  Jill Fitzgerald,et al.  Research on Revision in Writing , 1987 .

[8]  C. MacArthur,et al.  The Impact of Computers on the Writing Process , 1988, Exceptional children.

[9]  Christina Haas,et al.  Does the Medium Make a Difference? Two Studies of Writing With Pen and Paper and With Computers , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: a field experiment in group writing , 1990, CSCW '90.

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Expressive richness: a comparison of speech and text as media for revision , 1991, CHI.

[12]  Ron Owston,et al.  The Effects of Word Processing on Students' Writing Quality and Revision Strategies. , 1992 .

[13]  David L. Wallace.  Collaborative Planning and Transforming Knowledge , 1994 .

[14]  Davida Charney,et al.  Distributed collaborative writing: a comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[15]  Davida Charney,et al.  Distributed collaborative writing: a comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents , 1994, CHI '94.

[17]  Christina Haas,et al.  Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy , 1995 .

[18]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Using Technology to Enhance the Writing Processes of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[19]  Charles K. Kinzer,et al.  Effects of Technology on Process Writing: Are They All Good? , 1998 .

[20]  T. Sanders,et al.  Identifying Writing Strategies Through Text Analysis , 1999 .

[21]  James Hartley,et al.  Writing through time: longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Robert L. Carringer.  Collaboration and Concepts of Authorship , 2001, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[23]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[24]  Geoffrey A. Cross.  Forming the Collective Mind: A Contextual Exploration of Large-Scale Collabora- , 2004 .

[25]  Jason Swarts,et al.  Cooperative writing: achieving coordination together and apart , 2004, SIGDOC '04.

[26]  Andrew Lih,et al.  Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource , 2004 .

[27]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[28]  Thomas Chesney,et al.  An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility , 2006, First Monday.

[29]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  Computing trust from revision history , 2006, PST.

[30]  Edmund A. Mennis.  The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[31]  R. Rosenzweig.  Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past , 2006 .

[32]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[33]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  The Hidden Order of Wikipedia , 2007, HCI.

[34]  Luca de Alfaro,et al.  A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia , 2007, WWW '07.

[35]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Assessing the value of cooperation in Wikipedia , 2007, First Monday.