Use of the sterile insect technique against Aedes albopictus in Italy: First results of a pilot trial

In Europe, the mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse) is widespread in Italy, Albania and most probably in neighbouring Montenegro. Recent introductions have also been reported in France, Spain and southern Switzerland. In Italy, the species is currently recognized as the most noxious mosquito, thus requiring the implementation of intensive control programmes. Ae. albopictus is also a potential vector of human diseases, which has raised the issue of whether eradication campaigns are called for. This species is particularly suitable for application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) because of its urban-related distribution, recent introduction, low active dispersal potential, low population density which may be maintained by conventional control measures, and ease of mass-rearing. In 1999, a programme was initiated that focused on the application of the SIT against Ae. albopictus. A pilot rearing facility, targeted at the production of up to 20 000 male pupae per week has been established. Blood feeding is performed with a thermostatically controlled device using defibrinated bovine blood, egg hatching is stimulated with a nutrient broth culture, and egg counts conducted automatically. Larval density and larval diet are still being investigated in order to improve productivity, the separation of males is currently conducted at the pupal stage using calibrated metal sieves, and irradiation studies are performed at the 60Co plant Calliope, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and the Environment in Rome. During the summer of 2004, eight weekly sterile male pupal releases were organized in Rimini to evaluate sterile male performances in the field against a natural population. A significant difference was observed in the release area compared with the control area when the effects on egg fertility and egg density were cumulated. It is planned to continue the programme on a larger scale to improve rearing efficiency and obtain a preliminary benefit/cost evaluation.

[1]  R. Bellini,et al.  Efficacy of different ovitraps and binomial sampling in Aedes albopictus surveillance activity. , 1996, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[2]  D. Weidhaas,et al.  MATING ABILITY OF MALE MOSQUITOES, AEDES AEGYPTI L., STERILIZED CHEMICALLY OR BY GAMMA RADIATION , 1963 .

[3]  R. Bellini,et al.  Population structure of Aedes albopictus (Skuse): the mosquito which is colonizing Mediterranean countries , 2000, Heredity.

[4]  Roberto Romi Aedes albopictus in Italia: un problema sanitario sottovalutato , 2001 .

[5]  D. Shroyer Aedes albopictus and arboviruses: a concise review of the literature. , 1986, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[6]  H. Briegel,et al.  Physiological bases of mosquito ecology. , 2003, Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology.

[7]  W. Hausermann,et al.  Sterility introduced by release of genetically altered males to a domestic population of Aedes aegypti at the Kenya coast. , 1977, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[8]  L. P. Lounibos,et al.  Field trials with a translocation homozygote in Aedes aegypti for population replacement. , 1976, Journal of economic entomology.

[9]  H. Hagen,et al.  Routine blood-feeding of Aedes aegypti via a new membrane. , 1990, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[10]  W. Jakob,et al.  Evaluation of ovitraps in the U.S. Aedes aegypti eradication program. , 1969 .

[11]  V. Sharma,et al.  FIELD EXPERIMENTS ON THE COMPETITIVENESS OF MALES CARRYING GENETIC CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR AEDES AEGYPTI , 1976 .

[12]  P. Reiter,et al.  The used tire trade: a mechanism for the worldwide dispersal of container breeding mosquitoes. , 1987, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[13]  K. Dietz,et al.  Comparative field cage tests of the population suppressing efficiency of three genetic control systems for Aedes aegypti , 1976, Heredity.

[14]  D. Dame,et al.  Field competitiveness of males of Aedes aegypti (L.) heterozygous for a translocation. , 1975 .

[15]  G. White Chemosterilization of Aedes aegypti (L.) by Pupal Treatment , 1966, Nature.

[16]  V. Sharma,et al.  A device for the rapid separation of male and female mosquito pupae. , 1972, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[17]  P. Barbosa,et al.  A comparative study of egg hatching techniques for Aedes aegypti (L.). , 1969 .

[18]  M. Coosemans,et al.  First record of **Aedes (stegomyia) albopictus** (Skuze, 1894) in Belgium , 2004 .

[19]  C. J. Mitchell Geographic spread of Aedes albopictus and potential for involvement in arbovirus cycles in the Mediterranean basin , 1995 .

[20]  A Mechanical Device for the Rapid Sexing of Aedes aegypti Pupae , 1961 .

[21]  R. Novak,et al.  Eggs of Aedes triseriatus and Ae. hendersoni: a method to stimulate optimal hatch. , 1978 .

[22]  C. Apperson,et al.  Development and Survival of Immature Aedes albopictus and Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Laboratory: Effects of Density, Food, and Competition on Response to Temperature , 2000, Journal of medical entomology.

[23]  Stiphane Lafortune,et al.  OF A CONTROL STRATEGY , 1986 .

[24]  M. Mulla,et al.  Non-larvicidal effects of Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus on oviposition and adult mortality of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). , 2005, Journal of vector ecology : journal of the Society for Vector Ecology.

[25]  Physiological basis of sleep , 2004 .