The ‘Plateau‐ing’ of the European Better Regulation Agenda: An Analysis of Activities Carried out by the Barroso Commission

This paper examines the European Commission's (EC) Better Regulation Agenda, from the time that President Barroso came to power -- in November 2004 -- to the 2006 summer recess. It particularly focuses on whether the Commission's regulatory thinking has moved away from the precautionary principle and towards Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA), something I predicted in 2004 (Lofstedt, 2004). The article summarises the papers and communications in the Better Regulation area put forward by the Commission since November 2004, and makes a number of observations about how the Better Regulation Agenda may develop in the future. In conclusion I argue that the Commission's Better Regulation Agenda has plateaued. Commissioner Verheugen will not be successful in pushing the Agenda further forward because of issues such as REACH and opposition from member states, notably France. It is based on a combination of desk research and interviews with policy-makers, regulators, academics and stakeholders who have been involved either in shaping or fighting the Better Regulation Agenda.

[1]  C. Dunlop.  Impact assessment in the EU: the state of the art and the art of the state by Andrea Renda , 2006 .

[2]  E. Vos,et al.  The Juridification of Uncertainty: Observations on the Ambivalence of the Precautonary Principle within the EU and the WTO , 2002 .

[3]  G. Marchant.  The precautionary principle: an 'unprincipled' approach to biotechnology regulation , 2001 .

[4]  D. Vogel.  The Hare and the Tortoise Revisited: The New Politics of Consumer and Environmental Regulation in Europe , 2003 .

[5]  Stuart W G Derbyshire,et al.  Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Cass R. Sunstein.  Laws of Fear: SOLUTIONS , 2005 .

[7]  U. Epa.  Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment , 1986 .

[8]  P. Lowe,et al.  British environmental policy and Europe : politics and policy in transition , 1998 .

[9]  M. V. van Asselt,et al.  The Precautionary Principle and the Uncertainty Paradox , 2006 .

[10]  Marjolein B.A. Van Asselt,et al.  The complex significance of uncertainty in a risk era: logics, manners and strategies in use , 2005 .

[11]  J. Pelkmans,et al.  Regulatory reform and competitiveness in Europe , 2000 .

[12]  Ragnar E Löfstedt,et al.  Swedish Chemical Regulation: An Overview and Analysis , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Brendon Swedlow,et al.  Precautionary Regulation in Europe and the United States: A Quantitative Comparison , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  J. Wiener.  Whose Precaution After All ? A Comment on the Comparison and Evolution of Risk Regulatory Systems , 2003 .

[15]  M. Mccally,et al.  Positively Parents: Caring for a Severely Disabled Child; Taking Care; Running a Team for Disabled Children and Their Families; The Integration of Disabled Children into Mainstream Education: Ambitions, Theories and Practices , 1995 .

[16]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[17]  Lorenzo Allio,et al.  Enhancing the role of science in the decision-making of the European Union. , 2006, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  G. Majone.  Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth , 2009 .

[19]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Risk and reason : safety, law, and the environment , 2002 .

[20]  C. Ham.  What's the beef? The contested Governance of European Food Safety , 2009 .

[21]  R. Kagan.  American and European Ways of Law: Six Entrenched Differences , 2006 .

[22]  C. Sunstein.  Laws of Fear: Acknowledgments , 2005 .

[23]  Norman Lee,et al.  A Pilot Study of the Quality of European Commission Extended Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[24]  J. A. Baird.  Trading up. , 1998, Fund raising management.

[25]  Olivier Godard,et al.  The precautionary principle. Between social norms and economic constructs , 2004 .

[26]  A. Weale.  The new politics of pollution , 1991 .

[27]  Francis Chittenden,et al.  How Much Regulation is Gold Plate? A Study of UK Elaboration of EU Directives , 2004 .

[28]  From Green Image to Green Practice. Normative action and self-regulation. , 1999 .

[29]  R. Löfstedt.  The Swing of the Regulatory Pendulum in Europe: From Precautionary Principle to (Regulatory) Impact Analysis , 2003 .

[30]  Jacopo Torriti.  Impact Assessment in the EU: A Tool for Better Regulation, Less Regulation or Less Bad Regulation? , 2007 .

[31]  R. Kagan,et al.  Regulatory encounters : multinational corporations and American adversarial legalism , 2002 .

[32]  R. Kagan.  Should Europe Worry about Adversarial Legalism , 1997 .

[33]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[34]  Graham,et al.  Risk vs. Risk , 1995 .

[35]  J. Farman,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000 , 2002 .

[36]  Paul Collins,et al.  Regulatory impact analysis. Best practices in OECD countries Puma, OECD, Paris, 1997, 291 pp. , 2000 .

[37]  John D. Graham,et al.  Europe's precautionary principle: promise and pitfalls , 2002 .

[38]  Tim Ambler,et al.  Are Regulators Raising Their Game? Regulatory Impact Assessments in 2002/3 , 2004 .

[39]  R. Hahn,et al.  Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the U.S. And Europe , 2005 .

[40]  J. Graham.  A future for the precautionary principle? , 2001 .

[41]  G. Marchant,et al.  Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union Courts , 2004 .

[42]  L. Ross,et al.  Environmental policy in China , 1988 .

[43]  Lennart J. Lundqvist,et al.  Capacity-building or social construction? Explaining Sweden’s shift towards ecological modernisation , 2000 .

[44]  Jonathan B. Wiener,et al.  Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe , 2002 .

[45]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[46]  J. Wiener.  Precaution in a Multi-Risk World , 2001 .

[47]  Michael Faure,et al.  Green giants? : environmental policies of the United States and the European Union , 2004 .

[48]  W. H. Farland,et al.  Workshop report on EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Held in Virginia Beach, Virginia on January 11-13, 1989 , 1989 .

[49]  D. Vogel,et al.  The Changing Character of Regulation: A Comparison of Europe and the United States , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[50]  C. Radaelli.  What does regulatory impact assessment mean in Europe , 2005 .

[51]  Strategy for a future Chemicals Policy , 2001 .

[52]  C. Radaelli.  HOW CONTEXT MATTERS: REGULATORY QUALITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION , 2004 .

[53]  R. Dehousse,et al.  Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market , 2002 .

[54]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Appraising the precautionary principle – a decision analysis perspective , 2001 .

[55]  Tomas Öberg,et al.  Risk Management in Post‐Trust Societies , 2006 .

[56]  J. Graham.  Decision-analytic refinements of the precautionary principle , 2001 .

[57]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis – Best practice or lesson‐drawing? , 2004 .