Uncertainties in the risk assessment of hydropower dams:state-of-the-art and outlook

Risk assessment of hydropower dams is a topic of great interest for countries with extensive production facilities like Switzerland. Due to the high costs associated to the detailed simulation of dam failure events, however, traditional approaches to quantify the risk they pose are largely based on the statistical analysis of historical data, or on worst-case scenario modelling. In the latter case, the design of such scenarios is usually based on sometimes contrasting expert opinion or very sparse available data. In addition, there exist no unique framework or set of tools to quantitatively assess the socio-economical consequences of a dam-related flood event. The sparsity of available data, combined with the variability of environmental conditions (e.g. weather conditions, time of the day etc.) and lack of knowledge on the failure process (e.g. dam failure mechanisms) create an additional layer of uncertainty that is not yet properly dealt with in the current risk assessment workflows. This report summarizes the state-of-the-art of risk assessment for hydropower production dams at all levels: from the problem statement itself, to the technical tools (theoretical and numerical) available for its solution, with a focus on life loss estimation and on the role of uncertainty on the final analysis results. The work for this report was conducted within the project “Risk Governance of Deep Geothermal and Hydro Energy” of the National Research Programme “Energy Turnaround”. It is closely coordinated with ongoing activities of the Technology Assessment group at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) in both the National Research Program (NRP) 70 “Energy Turnaround” and the Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research (SCCER) “Supply of Electricity” (SoE).

[1]  Brett F. Sanders,et al.  Simulation of the St. Francis Dam-Break Flood , 2007 .

[2]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[3]  R. Lafitte,et al.  Probabilistic risk analysis of large dams: its value and limits , 1993 .

[4]  Silvia Bosa,et al.  Shallow water numerical model of the wave generated by the Vajont landslide , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  David S. Bowles,et al.  GIS Model for Estimating Dam Failure Life Loss , 2003 .

[6]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Peak Outflow from Breached Embankment Dam , 1989 .

[7]  J. Monaghan Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH , 1994 .

[8]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Dam Breach Modeling , 2016 .

[9]  Jesica Castillo-Rodríguez,et al.  Risk Analysis, Dam Safety, Dam Security and Critical Infrastructure Management , 2011 .

[10]  W.,et al.  United States Department of the Interior. , 1940, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[11]  Tony L. Wahl,et al.  DAM BREACH MODELING – AN OVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS METHODS , 2010 .

[12]  David S. Bowles,et al.  A Model for Estimating Dam Failure Life Loss , 2005 .

[13]  Gianluca De Sanctis,et al.  Generic Risk Assessment for Fire Safety , 2015 .

[14]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  Predicting Loss of Life in Cases of Dam Failure and Flash Flood , 1993 .

[16]  Árni Snorrason,et al.  Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models , 1984 .

[17]  Paolo Mignosa,et al.  3D SPH numerical simulation of the wave generated by the Vajont rockslide , 2013 .

[18]  J. M. Chandra Kishen,et al.  Recent developments in safety assessment of concrete gravity dams , 2005 .

[19]  David S. Bowles,et al.  LIFESim : A Tool for Estimating and Reducing Life-Loss Resulting from Dam and Levee Failures , 2009 .

[20]  Terje Aven,et al.  ALARP - What does it really mean? , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Liam Graham,et al.  A Procedure for Estimating Loss of Life Caused by Dam Failure , 1999 .

[22]  黒田 孝次,et al.  Highway Capacity Manual改訂の動向--テイラ-教授の講演より , 1984 .

[23]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety , 1976 .

[24]  Valerio Caleffi,et al.  Case Study: Malpasset Dam-Break Simulation using a Two-Dimensional Finite Volume Method , 2002 .

[25]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems‐Based Approach , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Gregory B. Baecher,et al.  Risk of Dam Failure in Benefit-Cost Analysis , 1980 .

[27]  D. L. Fread,et al.  BREACH: An erosion model for earthen dam failures , 1988 .

[28]  B D Greenshields,et al.  A study of traffic capacity , 1935 .

[29]  D. N. D. Hartford,et al.  Risk analysis for dam safety , 1995 .

[30]  Bram van Leer Godunov's Method for Gas-Dynamics , 1997 .

[31]  Yves Zech,et al.  Dam Break in Channels with 90° Bend , 2002 .

[32]  Tony L. Wahl,et al.  Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters , 2004 .

[33]  Eero Slunga CONCEPT AND BASES OF RISK ANALYSIS FOR DAMS With an example application on Kyrkösjärvi dam , 2001 .

[34]  Paolo Mignosa,et al.  A semi-analytical method for predicting the outflow hydrograph due to dam-break in natural valleys , 2014 .

[35]  Gianluca De Sanctis,et al.  Generic Risk Assessment for Fire Safety: Performance Evaluation and Optimisation of Design Provisions: Performance Evaluation and Optimisation of Design Provisions , 2015 .

[36]  T. Blaschke,et al.  Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis , 2006 .

[37]  D. De Wrachien,et al.  Dam-Break Problems, Solutions and Case Studies , 2009 .

[38]  Robert A. Dalrymple,et al.  Modeling Dam Break Behavior over a Wet Bed by a SPH Technique , 2008 .

[39]  Chiara Biscarini,et al.  On the Simulation of Floods in a Narrow Bending Valley: The Malpasset Dam Break Case Study , 2016 .

[40]  Zihai Shi,et al.  Discrete crack analysis of concrete gravity dams based on the known inertia force field of linear response analysis , 2014 .

[41]  J. E. Costa Floods from dam failures , 1985 .

[42]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[43]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[44]  Roberto Dones,et al.  Severe accidents in the energy sector: comparative perspective. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[45]  Guofu Huang,et al.  Theoretical Solution of Dam-Break Shock Wave , 1999 .

[46]  J. Monaghan Smoothed particle hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[47]  Sandra Soares Frazao,et al.  Dam-break flow in a channel with a sudden enlargement , 2003 .

[48]  David C. Froehlich,et al.  Embankment Dam Breach Parameters Revisited , 1995 .

[49]  D. N. D. Hartford,et al.  Risk analysis for dam safety - part II , 1995 .

[50]  David S. Bowles,et al.  Estimating Life Loss for Dam Safety Risk Assessment-a Review and New Approach , 2004 .

[51]  Sandra Soares Frazao,et al.  3rd CADAM meeting - The Toce River test case : numerical results analysis , 1999 .

[52]  Y. Zech,et al.  Treatment of Natural Geometry in Finite Volume River Flow Computations , 2003 .

[53]  D. M. Lumbroso,et al.  Evacuation and loss of life modelling to enhance emergency response , 2011 .

[54]  Pilar García-Navarro,et al.  Dam-break flow simulation : some results for one-dimensional models of real cases , 1999 .

[55]  Curtis A. Brown,et al.  Assessing the Threat to Life from DAM Failure , 1988 .

[56]  Sherong Zhang,et al.  Damage prediction of concrete gravity dams subjected to underwater explosion shock loading , 2014 .