Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?

Without market outcomes for comparison, internal consistency tests, particularly adding-up tests, are needed for credibility. When tested, contingent valuation has failed. Proponents find surveys tested poorly done. To the authors' knowledge, no survey has passed these tests. The 'embedding effect' is the similarity of willingness-to-pay responses that theory suggests (and sometimes requires) be different. This problem has long been recognized but not solved. The authors conclude that current methods are not suitable for damage assessment or benefit-cost analysis. They believe the problems come from an absence of preferences, not a flaw in survey methodology, making improvement unlikely.

[1]  Michael A. Kemp,et al.  EXPLORING A BUDGET CONTEXT FOR CONTINGENT VALUATION ESTIMATES , 1993 .

[2]  David B. Magleby.  Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States , 1984 .

[3]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[4]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[5]  J. Andreoni.  Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Rebecca Lynn Johnson,et al.  Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications, Rebecca L. Johnson and Gary V. Johnson, eds. 1990. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. 240 pages. ISBN: 0-8133-7838-9. $32.50 , 1990 .

[7]  S. Breyer.  Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation , 1993 .

[8]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability , 1993 .

[9]  J. Hausman,et al.  ON CONTINGENT VALUATION MEASUREMENT OF NONUSE VALUES , 1993 .

[10]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method , 1994, Journal of risk and uncertainty.

[11]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis , 1993 .

[12]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[13]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1996 .

[14]  Alan Randall,et al.  Too Many Proposals Pass the Benefit-Cost Test: Reply , 1989 .

[15]  Jon Strand,et al.  Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment , 1990 .

[16]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .

[17]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  The ASSESSOR Pre-Test Market Evaluation System , 1983 .

[18]  J. Hausman.  IS SYMPATHY AN ECONOMIC VALUE , 1993 .

[19]  Mark Dickie,et al.  Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative Study , 1987 .

[20]  Gregory K. Leonard,et al.  Chapter II – Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence , 1993 .

[21]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[22]  W. Hanemann,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992 .

[23]  John W. Payne,et al.  Where Do the Numbers Come From? How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions , 1993 .