Optimal management of a eutrophied coastal ecosystem: balancing agricultural and municipal abatement measures

Agriculture and municipal wastewater are the principal sources of eutrophying nutrients in many water ecosystems. We develop a model which considers the characteristics of agricultural and municipal nutrient abatement. The model explicitly accounts for the investment needed to set up wastewater treatment facilities, and makes it possible to determine the optimal timing of investment as well as the optimal agricultural and municipal abatement levels. We apply the model to the Finnish coastal waters of the Gulf of Finland. Our results indicate that substantial savings in abatement costs and the damage associated with eutrophication could be obtained by constructing the facilities needed to process all the wastewaters entering the coastal ecosystem. The optimal timing of investment is shown to hinge on both the economic and ecological characteristics of the ecosystem.

[1]  Markku Ollikainen,et al.  No-till technology:benefits to farmers and the environment? , 2006 .

[2]  J. Bergh.  Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics , 1999 .

[3]  William A. Brock,et al.  OPTIMAL PHOSPHORUS LOADING FOR A POTENTIALLY EUTROPHIC LAKE , 2003 .

[4]  A. Gabric,et al.  Review of the effects of non-point nutrient loading on coastal ecosystems , 1993 .

[5]  K. I. Krasnoborodko,et al.  The development of water supply and sewerage systems in St. Petersburg , 1999 .

[6]  F. Wulff,et al.  Modelling regional and large-scale response of Baltic Sea ecosystems to nutrient load reductions , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  S. Seitzinger,et al.  EUTROPHICATION OF SWEDISH SEAS , 2006 .

[8]  J. Lehtoranta.  Dynamics of sediment phosphorus in the brackish Gulf of Finland , 2003 .

[9]  F. A. Richards,et al.  The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water , 1963 .

[10]  I. Gren.  International Versus National Actions Against Nitrogen Pollution of the Baltic Sea , 2001 .

[11]  T. Söderqvist,et al.  The regional willingness to pay for a reduced eutrophication in the Stockholm archipelago , 2000 .

[12]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Petroleum Reservoir Exploitation: Switching from Primary to Secondary Recovery , 1986, Oper. Res..

[13]  Eric Naevdal,et al.  Optimal Regulation Of Eutrophying Lakes, Fjords And Rivers In The Presence Of Threshold Effects , 2001 .

[14]  Katarina Elofsson.  Cost-Effective Control of Interdependent Water Pollutants , 2006, Environmental management.

[15]  Katarina Elofsson.  Cost-effective reductions of stochastic agricultural loads to the Baltic Sea , 2003 .

[16]  J. Jones.  Agriculture and the environment , 1993 .

[17]  T. Żylicz,et al.  Costing an international public good: the case of the Baltic Sea , 1999 .

[18]  Miltiadis Makris,et al.  Necessary conditions for infinite-horizon discounted two-stage optimal control problems , 2001 .

[19]  Natwar M. Gandhi.  Government of the District of Columbia , 2010 .

[20]  T. Söderqvist,et al.  Nutrient Reductions to the Baltic Sea: Ecology, Costs and Benefits , 1997 .

[21]  K. Koikkalainen,et al.  Abatement costs for agricultural nitrogen and phosphorus loads: a case study of South-Western Finland , 2005 .

[22]  John Reed,et al.  Final summary report , 1992 .

[23]  Robert S. Pindyck,et al.  Irreversibilities and the Timing of Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[24]  Anastasios Xepapadeas,et al.  The Economics of Shallow Lakes , 2000 .

[25]  Toby Tyrrell,et al.  The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production , 1999, Nature.

[26]  Thomas Neumann,et al.  Towards a 3D-ecosystem model of the Baltic Sea , 2000 .

[27]  H. Pitkänen,et al.  Internal Nutrient Fluxes Counteract Decreases in External Load: The Case of the Estuarial Eastern Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea , 2001, Ambio.

[28]  R. Hart.  Dynamic pollution control—time lags and optimal restoration of marine ecosystems , 2003 .

[29]  Ing-Marie Gren,et al.  Cooperation with respect to cleaning of an international water body with stochastic environmental damage: the case of the Baltic Sea , 2003 .

[30]  David Letson,et al.  Point/Nonpoint Source Trading of Pollution Abatement: Choosing the Right Trading Ratio , 1993 .

[31]  A. Freeman.  The Benefits of Water Quality Improvements for Marine Recreation: A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 1995, Marine Resource Economics.

[32]  Nitrogen in the Baltic Sea--policy implications of stock effects. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Heikki Pitkänen,et al.  A simple sediment process description suitable for 3D-ecosystem modelling — Development and testing in the Gulf of Finland , 2006 .

[34]  I. Bateman,et al.  Managing nutrient fluxes and pollution in the Baltic: An interdisciplinary simulation study , 1999 .

[35]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Eutrophication in Europe's coastal waters , 2001 .

[36]  Paul L. Fackler,et al.  Applied Computational Economics and Finance , 2002 .

[37]  D. B. Nedwell,et al.  Environmental costs of freshwater eutrophication in England and Wales. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  P. Ekholm,et al.  Cost effective water protection in the Gulf of Finland – Focus on St. Petersburg , 2003 .

[39]  T. Neumann,et al.  Inter-annual variability in cyanobacteria blooms in the Baltic Sea controlled by wintertime hydrographic conditions , 2004 .

[40]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change , 1999 .

[41]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of denitrification in the sediments of the northern Baltic Proper , 1998 .

[42]  Ken Tomiyama,et al.  Two-stage optimal control problems and optimality conditions , 1985 .

[43]  S. Carpenter,et al.  ECONOMIC VALUATION OF FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE UNITED STATES: 1971-1997 , 1999 .