Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance

Traditionally, corporations which complied with the dictates of applicable legislation would have regarded not just their legal, but also their social obligations, as ending at that point. Socio-legal research suggests that corporations complied with law only for instrumental reasons (to avoid legal penalties) or, because "regulations are taken to be a measure of societal expectations, and [are] thus interpreted as a guide to an organisation's moral and social duties," (Wright, 1998: 14). From this traditional point of view, corporations could be expected to take actions which went 'beyond compliance' only where they saw some self-interest in doing so, such as increasing profit, usually over the short-term (Porter and Van der Linde, 1995)

[1]  Noga Morag-Levine Between Choice and Sacrifice: Constructions of Community Consent in Reactive Air Pollution Regulation , 1994 .

[2]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Effectiveness of the EPA's Regulatory Enforcement: The Case of Industrial Effluent Standards , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  The power of incrementalism: environmental regulation and technological change in pulp and paper bleaching in the US , 1998 .

[4]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter? , 2003 .

[5]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[6]  N. Gunningham,et al.  Leaders and Laggards: Next-Generation Environmental Regulation , 2002 .

[7]  Bridget M. Hutter,et al.  The Response of Business to Social Regulation in England and Wales: An Enforcement Perspective* , 1993 .

[8]  N. Gunningham Negotiated Non-Compliance: A Case Study of Regulatory Failure , 1987 .

[9]  J. Vincent Putting Pressure on Polluters: Indonesia's PROPER Program , 1997 .

[10]  D. O'Rourke,et al.  Reinventing Environmental Regulation from the Grassroots Up: Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory , 2000, Environmental management.

[11]  Andy B. Anderson,et al.  Updating the Deterrence Doctrine , 1986 .

[12]  Isabelle Reymen,et al.  Down to earth: Popularisation of geo-information services in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[13]  I. Thomson,et al.  Earning a social licence to operate : Social acceptability and resource development in Latin America , 2000 .

[14]  Abby Ghobadian,et al.  Extending linear approaches to mapping corporate environmental behaviour , 1998 .

[15]  David A. Sonnenfeld,et al.  Social Movements and Ecological Modernization: The Transformation of Pulp and Paper Manufacturing , 1999 .

[16]  Barry J. Seldon,et al.  Modeling compliance to environmental regulation: Evidence from manufacturing industries , 1997 .

[17]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[18]  B. Davy Essential Injustice: When Legal Institutions Cannot Resolve Environmental and Land Use Disputes , 1997 .

[19]  Alan Neale Organisational learning in contested environments: lessons from Brent Spar , 1997 .

[20]  Forest L. Reinhardt,et al.  Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management , 2000 .

[21]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment , 2003 .

[22]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Optimum Enforcement of Laws , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Andrew Flynn,et al.  Sector variation and ecological modernization: towards an analysis at the level of the firm , 1998 .

[24]  John d. McClelland,et al.  The Costs of Water Pollution Regulation in the Pulp and Paper Industry , 1999 .

[25]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Integrating Environmental Justice into EPA Permitting Authority , 2000 .

[26]  Sheila Rose Foster Justice from the Ground Up: Distributive Inequities, Grassroots Resistance, and the Transformative Politics of the Environmental Justice Movement , 1998 .

[27]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues , 1994 .