An acoustic method for flow rate estimation in agricultural sprayer nozzles

Abstract The cost of current flow rate measurement devices is quite high compared to the cost of low-end microphones. This circumstance, together with the fact that common agricultural sprayers have more than 50 nozzles, makes the use of current flow rate measurement devices cost-prohibitive. That considered, this article examines, by proposing one particular method, the feasibility of using microphones as flowmeters for nozzle tips in agricultural sprayers. The proposed method consists of the following stages: ( i ) acquisition of the digital acoustic data sequence, ( ii ) signal preprocessing, ( iii ) frequency domain transformation using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis, ( iv ) in-band power calculation, ( v ) power normalization, and ( vi ) regression or curve fitting. This method was assessed in an in-lab sprayer test bench employing 11 commercial nozzle tips at several operating flow rates within or close to those recommended by the manufacturers. The experimental results yielded, for all the tested nozzle tips, average absolute and relative Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values always below 0.08 liters per minute (lpm) and 5%, respectively, while the overall mean absolute and relative RMSE values were lower than 0.05 lpm and 2.5%. Furthermore, for each tested nozzle tip, the Maximum Absolute Error (MAE) was always bounded below 0.3 lpm, being the absolute error lower than 0.15 lpm for 95% of the time. The accuracies when employing a high-end microphone instead of a low-end one presented no statistically significant differences. These results provide strong evidence of the feasibility of accurately estimating the nozzle tip flow rate in real time based on acoustic signals. Moreover, no significant improvements are to be expected by using a high-end microphone instead of a low-end one. However, there are still some issues that should be tackled in order to enable the application of this method in real agricultural settings.

[1]  J. Weber,et al.  Efficacy of Selected Herbicides as Influenced by Soil Properties , 1990, Weed Technology.

[2]  R. P. Evans,et al.  Flow Rate Measurements Using Flow-Induced Pipe Vibration , 2004 .

[3]  D. Mulla Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps , 2013 .

[4]  M. Loghavi,et al.  Development of a target oriented weed control system , 2008 .

[5]  A Avraham Hirschberg,et al.  The whistling potentiality of an orifice in a confined flow using an energetic criterion , 2009 .

[6]  A. R. Frost,et al.  A review of agricultural spray metering , 1985 .

[7]  Michael Kohlmann Selecting the right flowmeter for the job , 2004 .

[8]  Yosuke Kurihara,et al.  Development of Vibration Sensor with Wide Frequency Range Based on Condenser Microphone -Estimation System for Flow Rate in Water Pipes- , 2012 .

[9]  Toshiya Takami,et al.  3D Calculation with Compressible LES for Sound Vibration of Ocarina , 2009, 0911.3567.

[10]  Shaw-Ching Sheen Noise Generated by Multiple-Jet Nozzles With Conical Profiles , 2011, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[11]  Y Skibbe,et al.  13th Computer Control for Water Industry Conference, CCWI 2015 Correlating sound and flow rate at a tap , 2015 .

[12]  Xavier Gloerfelt,et al.  Investigation of flow structures involved in sound generation by two- and three-dimensional cavity flows , 2011 .

[13]  Patrick Leehey,et al.  The Acoustic Source Created by Turbulent Flow over Orifices and Louvers , 1987 .

[14]  Jordi Llorens,et al.  Variable rate sprayer. Part 2 - Vineyard prototype: Design, implementation, and validation , 2013 .

[15]  M. S. Howe Mechanism of sound generation by low Mach number flow over a wall cavity , 2004 .

[16]  L. Tian,et al.  Evaluation of a flow control system for site-specific herbicide applications , 1999 .

[17]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Development of Digital Flow Control System for Multi-Channel Variable-Rate Sprayers , 2014 .

[18]  Luc Mongeau,et al.  Sound generation by steady flow through glottis-shaped orifices. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  P. Testuda,et al.  Noise generated by cavitating single-hole and multi-hole orifices in a water pipe , 2007 .