Green neighbourhood : review on the international assessment systems

Abstract Neighbourhood is widely recognised as a fundamental building block of a city, and a good starting point to create a truly sustainable community. Green neighbourhood is also broadly defined as being moderately dense, mixed-use, designed at a human scale, active and public transportation oriented and literally “green”. A green neighbourhood assessment system is a tool that evaluates sustainability performance of a given neighbourhood against a set of criteria. This paper evaluates 20 major international green neighbourhood assessment systems in according to their sustainability coverage and features. Sustainability aspects used in this paper include transportation, infrastructure, ecology, resources, energy, community, location, economy and building. The results of this study show that community, resources and ecology are the three major sustainability aspects that applied in 18, 17 and 16 out of 20 assessment systems respectively. However, after assessing the sustainability aspects by their weightings in the assessment systems, the differences among them are reduced and their rate of importance in all the assessment systems became closer. Ecology, energy, transportation, resources and economy receive the highest weightings after affecting by their weightings and incredibly community dropped to the very low importance of weightings. Regarding regional distribution of the systems around the world, initiative of green neighbourhood assessment system was first started in United Kingdom and European Union in 2000 and 2004 respectively and this trend reached to United States in 2005. Meanwhile, LEED (ND) with 184 certificates/projects is the main well-known systems in the world followed by Envirodevelopment in Australia and SPeAR in the United Kingdom with 100 certificates/projects each. It is also found that the highest certification fee (minimum) is LEED (ND) with US$30,000 followed by Green Star (Communities) and CASSBEE and the highest evaluation fee (maximum) goes back to DGNB followed by LEED (ND) and Green Star (Communities). Future research can be conducted on the implementation of several green neighbourhood assessment systems on actual projects and compare their capabilities in measuring the rate of greening.

[1]  Jiahui Zhang,et al.  An effective Building Neighborhood Green Index model for measuring urban green space , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[2]  Gordon Mitchell,et al.  PROBLEMS AND FUNDAMENTALS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS , 1996 .

[3]  A. Bond,et al.  Sustainability assessment: the state of the art , 2012 .

[4]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[5]  Quansheng Ge,et al.  Assessing the impacts of urbanization-associated green space on urban land surface temperature: A case study of Dalian, China , 2017 .

[6]  A. Reith,et al.  Do green neighbourhood ratings cover sustainability , 2015 .

[7]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  Viability of using global standards for neighbourhood sustainability assessment: insights from a comparative case study , 2015 .

[8]  C. Turcu.  Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability , 2013 .

[9]  Hongxing Yang,et al.  A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools , 2015 .

[10]  P. Rajagopalan,et al.  Review on the impact of urban geometry and pedestrian level greening on outdoor thermal comfort , 2016 .

[11]  W. L. Lee,et al.  A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes , 2013 .

[12]  A. Zeinal Hamedani,et al.  A comparative study of DGNB, LEED and BREEAM certificate systems in urban sustainability , 2012 .

[13]  Min Gi Lee,et al.  A cost–benefit analysis for the institutionalization of the green certification scheme: the case of the development of the Sinjung district in Seoul, Korea , 2016 .

[14]  S. R. Chandratilake,et al.  Sustainability rating systems for buildings: Comparisons and correlations , 2013 .

[15]  Rania Jammazi,et al.  On the interplay between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emission nexus in the GCC countries: A comparative analysis through wavelet approaches , 2015 .

[16]  Ali GhaffarianHoseini,et al.  Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: a review of current theories, implementations and challenges , 2013 .

[17]  Akito Murayama,et al.  Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan , 2014 .

[18]  Gabriele Bolte,et al.  Relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic position and neighbourhood public green space availability: An environmental inequality analysis in a large German city applying generalized linear models. , 2017, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[19]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[20]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review , 2014 .

[21]  Xiaoming Wang,et al.  Low-carbon neighborhood planning technology and indicator system , 2016 .

[22]  Kei Saito,et al.  Evidence-based neighborhood greening and concomitant improvement of urban heat environment in the context of a world heritage site - Malacca, Malaysia , 2017, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[23]  Sheryn D. Pitman,et al.  Green infrastructure: Life support for human habitats , 2014 .

[24]  Appu Haapio,et al.  Towards sustainable urban communities , 2012 .

[25]  H. Karimipour,et al.  Introduction to a quantitative method for assessment of visual impacts of Tehran Towers , 2015 .

[26]  C. Ratti,et al.  Green streets − Quantifying and mapping urban trees with street-level imagery and computer vision , 2017 .

[27]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools , 2013 .

[28]  Hongbo Li,et al.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and urban public green spaces availability: A localized modeling approach to inform land use policy , 2016 .

[29]  Umberto Berardi.  Beyond Sustainability Assessment Systems: Upgrading Topics by Enlarging The Scale of Assessment , 2011 .

[30]  R. Karthaus,et al.  Urban sustainability standards: predetermined checklists or adaptable frameworks? , 2011 .

[31]  Kuppusamy Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Green roofs: A critical review on the role of components, benefits, limitations and trends , 2016 .

[32]  U. Berardi.  Sustainability assessment of urban communities through rating systems , 2013, Environment, Development and Sustainability.