Discriminating between climate observations in terms of their ability to improve an ensemble of climate predictions

In view of the cost and complexity of climate-observing systems, it is a matter of concern to know which measurements, by satellite or in situ, can best improve the accuracy and precision of long-term ensembles of climate projections. We follow a statistical procedure to evaluate the relative capabilities of a wide variety of observable data types for improving the accuracy and precision of an ensemble of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models. Thirty-two data types are evaluated for their potential for improving a 50-y surface air temperature trend prediction with data from earlier periods, with an emphasis on 20 y. Data types can be ordered in terms of their ability to increase the precision of a forecast. Results show that important conclusions can follow from this ordering. The small size of the IPCC model ensemble (20 members) creates uncertainties in these conclusions, which need to be substantiated with the larger ensembles expected in the future. But the larger issue of whether the methodology can provide useful answers is demonstrated.

[1]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[2]  R. F. Strickler,et al.  The relative importance of variables in initial conditions for dynamical weather prediction , 1970 .

[3]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[4]  John Skilling,et al.  Data analysis : a Bayesian tutorial , 1996 .

[5]  Lawrence S. Bernstein,et al.  Very Narrow Band Model Calculations of Atmospheric Fluxes and Cooling Rates , 1996 .

[6]  M. Allen.  Do-it-yourself climate prediction , 1999, Nature.

[7]  William L. Smith,et al.  AIRS/AMSU/HSB on the Aqua mission: design, science objectives, data products, and processing systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Regional Climate Change: A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Multimodel Ensembles , 2005 .

[9]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases , 2005, Nature.

[10]  E. Kamen,et al.  Introduction to Optimal Estimation , 1999 .

[11]  Robert Benjamin Lee,et al.  Reexamination of the Observed Decadal Variability of the Earth Radiation Budget Using Altitude-Corrected ERBE/ERBS Nonscanner WFOV Data , 2006 .

[12]  M. Kendall.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[13]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method , 2002 .

[14]  D. A. Lury,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1930, Nature.

[15]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[16]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment , 1996 .

[17]  D. C. Robertson,et al.  MODTRAN cloud and multiple scattering upgrades with application to AVIRIS , 1998 .

[18]  Clifford H. Dey,et al.  Observing-Systems Simulation Experiments: Past, Present, and Future , 1986 .

[19]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1989, Science.

[20]  John A. Dykema,et al.  Testing climate models using GPS radio occultation: A sensitivity analysis , 2006 .

[21]  Stephen S. Leroy,et al.  Climate Signal Detection Times and Constraints on Climate Benchmark Accuracy Requirements , 2008 .

[22]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Bayesian Modeling of Uncertainty in Ensembles of Climate Models , 2009 .