Active loose bolt detection in a complex satellite structure

This work focuses on the detection, localization, and quantification of damage in the form of loose bolts on an isogrid satellite structure. In the process of rapid satellite development and deployment, it is necessary to quickly complete several levels of validation tests. Structural Health Monitoring methods are being investigated as a means for reducing the number of validation tests required. This method for detecting loose bolts enables quick confirmation of proper assembly, and verification that structural fasteners are still intact after validation testing. Within this testing framework, feature selection is presented as well as a localization methodology. Quantification of fastener torque is also developed. Locating damage in an isogrid structure is complicated by the directionally dependent dispersion characteristics caused by a propagating wave passing through ribs and holes. For this reason, an actuation frequency with the best first wave arrival clarity is selected. A methodology is presented in which a time map is constructed for each actuator-sensor pair which establishes times of flight for each location on the sample. Differences in time between healthy and damaged sensor signals are then extracted and used to create a map of possible damage locations. These resulting solution maps are merged yielding a final damage position. Fastener torque is correlated to a damage parameter, and the loose bolt position is calculated within 3 cm.

[1]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Mode and Transducer Selection for Long Range Lamb Wave Inspection , 1999 .

[2]  R. M. Kent,et al.  Structural health monitoring: degradation mechanisms and system requirements , 2000, 19th DASC. 19th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37126).

[3]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Quantitative structural health monitoring using acoustic emission , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  Lin Ye,et al.  Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: A review , 2006 .

[5]  Fu-Kuo Chang,et al.  Design of a robust SHM system for composite structures , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[6]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  An improved technique for locating the point of impact from the acoustic emission data , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[7]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring , 2007 .

[8]  Lingyu Yu,et al.  Lamb Wave-Mode Tuning of Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[9]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Single Mode Tuning Effects on Lamb Wave Time Reversal with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[10]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  Active ultrasonic joint integrity adjudication for real-time structural health monitoring , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  Structural health monitoring: an enabler for responsive satellites , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[12]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Guided wave SHM with a distributed sensor network , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Active Damage Localization in Anisotropic Materials Using Guided Waves , 2009 .

[14]  Brandon Arritt,et al.  Damage Detection in Bolted Space Structures , 2010 .