Optical detection of field cancerization in the buccal mucosa of patients with esophageal cancer

Introduction: Esophageal cancer is an increasingly common type of neoplasm with a very poor prognosis. This prognosis could improve with more early tumor detection. We have previously shown that we can use an optical spectroscopy to detect field cancerization in the buccal mucosa of patients with laryngeal cancer. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether we could detect field cancerization of buccal mucosa of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Methods: Optical measurements were performed in vivo using a novel optical technique: multidiameter single‐fiber reflectance (MDSFR) spectroscopy. MDSFR spectra were acquired by a handheld probe incorporating three fiber diameters. Multiple absorption and scattering parameters that are related to the physiological and ultrastructural properties of the buccal mucosa were derived from these spectra. A linear discriminant analysis of the parameters was performed to create a combined biomarker ó to discriminate oncologic from non‐oncologic patients. Results: Twelve ESCC, 12 EAC, and 24 control patients were included in the study. The median value of our biomarker ó was significantly higher in patients with ESCC (2.07 [1.93–2.10]) than control patients (1.86 [1.73–1.95], p = 0.022). After cross‐validation ó was able to identify ESCC patients with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 70.8%. There were no significant differences between the EAC group and the control group. Conclusion: Field cancerization in the buccal mucosa can be detected using optical spectroscopy in ESCC patients. This may be the first step towards non‐invasive ESCC cancer screening.

[1]  V. Janout,et al.  Epidemiology of esophageal cancer--an overview article. , 2007, Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia.

[2]  A. Amelink,et al.  Optical pre-screening for laryngeal cancer using reflectance spectroscopy of the buccal mucosa. , 2018, Biomedical optics express.

[3]  Arjen Amelink,et al.  Method for rapid multidiameter single-fiber reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy through a fiber bundle , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  V. Backman,et al.  Nanocytology for field carcinogenesis detection: novel paradigm for lung cancer risk stratification. , 2011, Future oncology.

[5]  M. Krishnatreya,et al.  Synchronous primary cancers of the head and neck region and upper aero digestive tract: defining high-risk patients. , 2013, Indian journal of cancer.

[6]  Arjen Amelink,et al.  Method to quantitatively estimate wavelength-dependent scattering properties from multidiameter single fiber reflectance spectra measured in a turbid medium. , 2011, Optics letters.

[7]  J. Luketich,et al.  Oesophageal carcinoma , 2013, The Lancet.

[8]  C. Hoy,et al.  Correction for tissue optical properties enables quantitative skin fluorescence measurements using multi-diameter single fiber reflectance spectroscopy. , 2015, Journal of dermatological science.

[9]  C. Betz,et al.  Measurement of epithelial thickness within the oral cavity using optical coherence tomography , 2012, Head & neck.

[10]  Anthony J Alberg,et al.  Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). , 2007, Chest.

[11]  U. A. Gamm,et al.  Quantification of the reduced scattering coefficient and phase-function-dependent parameter γ of turbid media using multidiameter single fiber reflectance spectroscopy: experimental validation. , 2012, Optics letters.

[12]  Ji Yi,et al.  Ultrastructural alterations in field carcinogenesis measured by enhanced backscattering spectroscopy , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  D. Evers,et al.  Optical spectroscopy: current advances and future applications in cancer diagnostics and therapy. , 2012, Future oncology.

[14]  Arjen Amelink,et al.  Sources of variability in the quantification of tissue optical properties by multidiameter single-fiber reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy , 2015, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  A. Amelink,et al.  Measurement of tissue scattering properties using multi-diameter single fiber reflectance spectroscopy: in silico sensitivity analysis , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[16]  A. Amelink,et al.  Monte Carlo analysis of single fiber reflectance spectroscopy: photon path length and sampling depth , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  P. Angadi,et al.  Oral field cancerization: current evidence and future perspectives , 2012, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  David Sidransky,et al.  The Oral Cavity as a Molecular Mirror of Lung Carcinogenesis , 2008, Cancer Prevention Research.

[20]  L. Maxim,et al.  Screening tests: a review with examples , 2014, Inhalation toxicology.

[21]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics, 2012 , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[22]  A. Gazdar,et al.  Surrogate anatomic/functional sites for evaluating cancer risk: an extension of the field effect. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[23]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Nanoscale markers of esophageal field carcinogenesis: potential implications for esophageal cancer screening , 2013, Endoscopy.

[24]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Association between rectal optical signatures and colonic neoplasia: potential applications for screening. , 2009, Cancer research.

[25]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Nanoscale cellular changes in field carcinogenesis detected by partial wave spectroscopy. , 2009, Cancer research.

[26]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Light-scattering technologies for field carcinogenesis detection: a modality for endoscopic prescreening. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[27]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Buccal Spectral Markers for Lung Cancer Risk Stratification , 2014, PloS one.