CASE STUDIES IN THIN CLIENT ACCEPTANCE

Thin Client technology boasts an impressive range of financial, technical and administrative benefits. Combined with virtualisation technology, higher bandwidth availability and cheaper high performance processors, many believe that Thin Clients have come of age. But despite a growing body of literature documenting successful Thin Client deployments there remains an undercurrent of concern regarding user acceptance of this technology and a belief that greater efforts are required to understand how to integrate Thin Clients into existing, predominantly PC-based, deployments. It would be more accurate to state that the challenge facing the acceptance of Thin Clients is a combination of architectural design and integration strategy rather than a purely technical issue. Careful selection of services to be offered over Thin Clients is essential to their acceptance. Through an evolution of three case studies the user acceptance issues were reviewed and resolved resulting in a 92% acceptance rate of the final Thin Client deployment. No significant bias was evident in our comparison of user attitudes towards desktop services delivered over PCs and Thin Clients.

[1]  Jason Nieh,et al.  THINC: a virtual display architecture for thin-client computing , 2005, SOSP '05.

[2]  I. Wong-Bushby,et al.  A Case Study in SOA and Re-architecture at Company ABC , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[3]  Susan C. Speer.  Extending the reach of the thin client , 2001 .

[4]  Mark Weiser.  How computers will be used differently in the next twenty years , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (Cat. No.99CB36344).

[5]  Monica S. Lam,et al.  The collective: a cache-based system management architecture , 2005, NSDI.

[6]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Mikael Jern.  "Thin" vs. "fat" visualization clients , 1998, AVI '98.

[9]  Mikael Jern.  "Thin" vs. "fat" visualization client , 1998, Proceedings. Computer Graphics International (Cat. No.98EX149).

[10]  Jason Nieh,et al.  The Performance of Remote Display Mechanisms for Thin-Client Computing , 2002, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track.

[11]  Gleeson Michael.  Towards the Deployment of Flexible and Efficient Learning Tools:The Thin Client , 2007 .

[12]  Andy Hopper,et al.  Teleporting in an X Window System Environment , 1994 .

[13]  Sharon Crawford,et al.  Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 オフィシャルマニュアル , 1997 .

[14]  Simon Kissler,et al.  Using thin client technology to reduce complexity and cost , 2005, SIGUCCS '05.

[15]  Andy Hopper,et al.  A ubiquitous, personalized computing environment for all: Teleporting in an X Window System Environment , 1994, IEEE Personal Communications.

[16]  Jerry Golick.  Network computing in the new thin-client age , 1999, NTWK.

[17]  Jason Nieh,et al.  A Comparison of Thin-Client Computing Architectures , 2000 .

[18]  C. Collier.  AN INEFFICIENT TRUTH , 2011 .

[19]  Andy Hopper,et al.  Virtual Network Computing , 1998, IEEE Internet Comput..

[20]  Andrew Birrell,et al.  Implementing Portable Desktops: a New Option and Comparisons , 2006 .

[21]  J. Duane Northcutt,et al.  The interactive performance of SLIM: a stateless, thin-client architecture , 1999, SOSP.

[22]  Jason Nieh,et al.  Reducing Downtime Due to System Maintenance and Upgrades (Awarded Best Student Paper!) , 2005, LISA.

[23]  Bill Childers.  PXE: not just for server networks anymore! , 2009 .