Accurate preoperative estimation of liver-graft volumetry using three-dimensional computed tomography

Background. The aim of this study was to clarify the value of three-dimensional computed-tomography (3D-CT) volumetry for size matching in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods. 3D-CT volumetry was applied to 25 donors who underwent hepatectomy for a living relative needing an orthotopic liver transplantation. Fifteen patients underwent extended left lobectomy, one patient an extended left lateral lobectomy, and nine patients right lobectomy. 3D-CT imaging was performed with the workstation ZIO M900 (Zio Software Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The estimated volume of the grafts in two-dimensional (2D) and 3D images were compared, and an error ratio was calculated. Results. 3D-CT imaging revealed the anatomy of the hepatic vein bifurcation and the shape of the graft. The error ratio was 12.8±2.3% in 3D, compared with 19.4±2.5% in 2D. As such, 3D-CT volumetry appears to be more exact than conventional 2D-CT volumetry, but volumetry by 3D-CT still produces an error ratio of approximately 13%. The weight transition of the rats’ livers under preservation in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution indicated that the graft volume seems to decrease during perfusion with UW solution. Mismatch of the cutting line and volume reduction by dehydration (approximately 5% reduction 1 hour after perfusion) seems to cause the error in 3D-CT volumetry. Conclusions. Three-dimensional CT volumetry is useful for size matching in cases of living-related orthotopic liver transplantation.

[1]  W L Nowinski,et al.  Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[2]  S. Fan,et al.  Technical refinement in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[3]  A. Marcos Right‐lobe living donor liver transplantation , 2000, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[4]  T Kiuchi,et al.  Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. , 1999, Transplantation.

[5]  K Sugimachi,et al.  Small Graft for Living Donor Liver Transplantation , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[6]  S. Kawasaki,et al.  Living related liver transplantation in adults. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[7]  R. Calne,et al.  ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN THE RAT: TECHNIQUE USING CUFF FOR PORTAL VEIN ANASTOMOSIS AND BILIARY DRAINAGE , 1979, Transplantation.

[8]  A. Marcos Right lobe living donor liver transplantation: A review , 2000, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[9]  M Hashizume,et al.  Beneficial effects of 3-dimensional visualization on hepatic vein reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft. , 2001, Transplantation.

[10]  R. Fisher,et al.  Surgical management of anatomical variations of the right lobe in living donor liver transplantation. , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Hong-Jin Kim,et al.  Surgical techniques and innovations in living related liver transplantation. , 1993, Annals of surgery.