Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: A strategy for uncovering cortical sources

SummaryThis paper describes a uniform method for calculating the interpolation of scalp EEG potential distribution, the current source density (CSD), the cortical potential distribution (cortical mapping) and the CSD of the cortical potential distribution. It will be shown that interpolation and deblurring methods such as CSD or cortical mapping are not independent of the inverse problem in potential theory. Not only the resolution but also the accuracy of these techniques, especially those of deblurring, depend greatly on the spatial sampling rate (i.e., the number of electrodes). Using examples from simulated and real (64 channels) data it can be shown that the application of more than 100 EEG channels is not only favourable but necessary to guarantee a reasonable accuracy in the calculations of CSD or cortical mapping. Likewise, it can be shown that using more than 250 electrodes does not improve the resolution.

[1]  Lehrbuch der Höheren Geodäsie , 1957 .

[2]  D. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Wahba.  Spline Interpolation and Smoothing on the Sphere , 1981 .

[4]  W. Freeden,et al.  On spherical spline interpolation and approximation , 1981 .

[5]  Y. Yamashita.  Theoretical Studies on the Inverse Problem in Electrocardiography and the Uniqueness of the Solution , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Use of the Finite Element Method to Determine Epicardial from Body Surface Potentials Under a Realistic Torso Model , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Olivier Bertrand,et al.  Scalp Current Density Mapping: Value and Estimation from Potential Data , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  T. Elbert,et al.  Can subcortical structures generate potentials large in amplitude , 1990 .

[10]  J. Desmond,et al.  Seeing through the skull: advanced EEGs use MRIs to accurately measure cortical activity from the scalp. , 1991 .

[11]  J. Pernier,et al.  Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[12]  F. Perrin,et al.  Dissociation of temporal and frontal components in the human auditory N1 wave: a scalp current density and dipole model analysis. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  A Gevins,et al.  High resolution EEG: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and MRI integration methods. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  P. Nunez,et al.  A theoretical and experimental study of high resolution EEG based on surface Laplacians and cortical imaging. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  R. B. Silberstein,et al.  Comparison of high resolution EEG methods having different theoretical bases , 2005, Brain Topography.