The Macroeconomics of Low Inflation

THE CONCEPT of a natural unemployment rate has been central to most modern models of inflation and stabilization. According to these models, inflation will accelerate or decelerate depending on whether unemployment is below or above the natural rate, while any existing rate of inflation will continue if unemployment is at the natural rate. The natural rate is thus the minimum, and only, sustainable rate of unemployment, but the inflation rate is left as a choice variable for policymakers. Since complete price stability has attractive features, many economists and policymakers who accept the natural rate hypothesis believe that central banks should target zero inflation. We question the standard version of the natural rate model and each of these implications. Central to our analysis is the effect of downward nominal wage rigidity in an economy in which individual firms experience stochastic shocks in the demand for their output. We embed these features in a model that otherwise resembles a standard natural rate model and show there is no unique natural unemployment rate. Rather, the rate of unemployment that is consistent with steady inflation

[1]  W. Wascher,et al.  Inflation, Nominal Wage Rigidity, and the Efficiency of Labor Markets , 1995 .

[2]  C. Schultze Recent inflation in the United States , 1959 .

[3]  Shulamit Kahn,et al.  Evidence of Nominal Wage Stickiness from Microdata , 1997 .

[4]  James Tobin,et al.  Inflation and unemployment , 1972 .

[5]  A. O'brien A Behavioral Explanation for Nominal Wage Rigidity During the Great Depression , 1989 .

[6]  R. Shiller Why Do People Dislike Inflation? , 1996 .

[7]  John Bound,et al.  The Extent of Measurement Error in Longitudinal Earnings Data: Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? , 1988, Journal of Labor Economics.

[8]  N. Mankiw,et al.  Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Economic Fluctuations , 1992 .

[9]  David Card,et al.  Does Inflation "Grease the Wheels of the Labor Market"? , 1996 .

[10]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  An Investigation of the Extent and Consequences of Measurement Error in Labor-Economic Survey Data , 1985, Journal of Labor Economics.

[11]  Robert E. Gallman,et al.  Productivity Trends in the United States. , 1962 .

[12]  Hal S. Sider,et al.  Accuracy of Response in Labor Market Surveys: Evidence and Implications , 1983, Journal of Labor Economics.

[13]  Christina D. Romer,et al.  Inflation and the Growth Rate of Output , 1996 .

[14]  Dale W. Jorgenson Long Term Economic Growth, 1860-1965. , 1967 .

[15]  M. Feldstein,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Going from Low Inflation to Price Stability , 1996 .

[16]  W. Dickens Wages, Employment and the Threat of Collective Action by Workers , 1986 .

[17]  John W. Kendrick,et al.  Productivity Trends in the United States. , 1962 .

[18]  I. Fisher,et al.  The Money Illusion. , 1929 .

[19]  D. Mitchell Wage Flexibility: Then and Now , 1985 .

[20]  C. Campbell,et al.  The Reasons for Wage Rigidity: Evidence From a Survey of Firms , 1997 .

[21]  Jonathan S. Leonard In the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time: The Extent of Frictional and Structural Unemployment , 1986 .

[22]  C. Schultze Some Macro Foundations for Micro Theory , 1981 .

[23]  T. Bewley,et al.  A Depressed Labor Market as Explained by Participants , 1995 .

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  CHAPTER EIGHT. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market , 2004 .

[25]  T. Dernburg,et al.  Manpower in Economic Growth: The American Record Since 1800. , 1965 .

[26]  Marcus Miller,et al.  ル-ルを変更して--サッチャ-政権の経済的帰結(Brookings Papers on Economic Activity) , 1984 .

[27]  M. Bils The Cyclical Behavior of Marginal Cost and Price , 1987 .

[28]  A. J. Jaffe,et al.  Manpower in Economic Growth: The American Record since 1800 by Stanley Lebergott (review) , 1965 .

[29]  T. Sargent A Note on the 'Accelerationist' Controversy , 1971 .

[30]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.