Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online Choice Experiment in Germany

With liberalization in 1998, numerous firms have entered the German retail electricity market, including newly formed cooperatives. Based on Transaction Cost Economics, we develop a theoretical framework seeking to explain preferences for electricity supplied by cooperatives from a consumer perspective. Drawing on a convenience sample of 287 German electricity consumers and Choice Experiment data from an online survey, we estimate Willingness-to-Pay values for organizational attributes of electricity suppliers, while accounting for observed and unobserved heterogeneity. Consumers in the sample exhibit a large Willingness-to-Pay for renewable energy. Our results also indicate a substantial Willingness-to-Pay for transparent pricing, participation in decision making, and local suppliers. Democratic decision making – a distinct feature of cooperatives – exhibits positive Willingness-to-Pay values for approximately one fifth of the sample. Taken together, our findings suggest a slightly higher Willingness-to-Pay for electricity produced by cooperatives. Limitations of applied sampling and other important aspects of energy transition are also discussed.

[1]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[2]  Paul C. Stern,et al.  Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding , 2014 .

[3]  Michael L. Cook,et al.  The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach , 1995 .

[4]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in denmark , 2007 .

[5]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Homeowners' preferences for adopting innovative residential heating systems: A discrete choice analysis for Germany , 2012 .

[6]  Theresia Theurl,et al.  Governance Strukturen im genossenschaftlichen Finanzverbund: Anforderungen und Konsequenzen ihrer Ausgestaltung , 2002 .

[7]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[8]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments , 2008 .

[9]  Martin Achtnicht,et al.  Do environmental benefits matter? Evidence from a choice experiment among house owners in Germany , 2011 .

[10]  Joanna Coast,et al.  Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. , 2012, Health economics.

[11]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[12]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model , 2010 .

[13]  K. Remoundou,et al.  Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution , 2012 .

[14]  Mario Soliño,et al.  Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: Implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas , 2011 .

[15]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[16]  Azucena Gracia,et al.  Can renewable energy be financed with higher electricity prices? Evidence from a Spanish region , 2012 .

[17]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain , 2002 .

[18]  K. Willis,et al.  Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies , 2010 .

[19]  Alberto Longo,et al.  The Internalization of Externalities in the Production of Electricity: Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of a Policy for Renewable Energy , 2006 .

[20]  B. Roe.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[21]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  S. Yoo,et al.  Willingness to pay for renewable energy investment in Korea: A choice experiment study , 2010 .

[23]  Julian Sagebiel,et al.  Coping with power scarcity in an emerging megacity: a consumers' perspective from Hyderabad , 2010 .

[24]  Denzil G. Fiebig,et al.  The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[25]  A. Butler.  The New Economics of Sustainable Consumption: Seeds of Change , 2011 .

[26]  S. Rosen.  Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Malte Müller,et al.  The Cooperative Yardstick Revisited: Panel Evidence from the European Dairy Sectors , 2013 .

[29]  Allison M. Borchers,et al.  Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? A contingent choice experiment , 2007 .

[30]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Carbon Lock-Out: Advancing Renewable Energy Policy in Europe , 2012 .

[31]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data , 1983 .

[32]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science: Students as Experimental Participants , 2011 .

[33]  Arne Risa Hole,et al.  A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. , 2007, Health economics.

[34]  D. Street,et al.  The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods by STREET, D. J. and BURGESS, L. , 2007 .

[35]  Sebastian Strunz.  The German energy transition as a regime shift , 2014 .

[36]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Landscape externalities from onshore wind power , 2010 .

[37]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Do Respondents' Perceptions of the Status Quo Matter in Non-Market Valuation with Choice Experiments? An Application to New Zealand Freshwater Streams , 2011 .

[38]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Energy policy and research: The underappreciation of trust , 2014 .

[39]  Andreas C. Goldthau,et al.  Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism , 2014 .

[40]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[41]  H. Bonus,et al.  The Cooperative Association as a Business Enterprise: A Study in the Economics of Transactions* , 1986 .

[42]  R. Walz,et al.  Sustainability innovations in the electricity sector , 2012 .

[43]  Albino Prada,et al.  Social demand for electricity from forest biomass in Spain: Does payment periodicity affect the willingness to pay? , 2009 .

[44]  F. Johnson,et al.  Opt-out alternatives and anglers' stated preferences , 2000 .

[45]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[46]  D. Hensher,et al.  Households’ Willingness to Pay for Water Service Attributes , 2005 .

[47]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[48]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[49]  H. Hansmann,et al.  The Ownership of Enterprise , 1996 .

[50]  Mario Soliño,et al.  External benefits of biomass-e in Spain: an economic valuation. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[51]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[52]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[53]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments , 2005 .

[54]  Richard C. Ready,et al.  Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology , 2014 .

[55]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[56]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Contract farming configuration: Smallholders’ preferences for contract design attributes , 2013 .

[57]  D. Jansen.  Local Utilities in the German Electricity Market and Their Role in the Diffusion of Innovations in Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Mitigation , 2012 .

[58]  K. Araújo.  The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities , 2014 .

[59]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples , 2013 .

[60]  E. G. Furubotn,et al.  Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics , 2005 .

[61]  F. Chaddad,et al.  Understanding New Cooperative Models: An Ownership–Control Rights Typology , 2004 .

[62]  B. Sovacool.  What Are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda , 2014 .

[63]  C. Cornforth.  The Governance of Cooperatives and Mutual Associations: A Paradox Perspective , 2004 .

[64]  John M. Rose,et al.  Can scale and coefficient heterogeneity be separated in random coefficients models? , 2012 .

[65]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Experimental subjects are not different , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[66]  William J. Baumol,et al.  On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly in a Multiproduct Industry , 1977 .

[67]  John M. Rose,et al.  Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies , 2007 .

[68]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: A choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands , 2009 .

[69]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay , 2010 .

[70]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany , 2013 .

[71]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[72]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[73]  Lars Holstenkamp,et al.  Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland , 2015 .

[74]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[75]  F. Chaddad,et al.  Control Rights, Governance and the Costs of Ownership in Agricultural Cooperatives , 2013 .

[76]  A. Deaton.  The Analysis of Household Surveys : A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy , 1997 .